Yes, but you can also fault the airlines for getting law enforcement involved in the first place.

Shit, I didn’t know this!

As a realist, I vote settlement (as long as it is fair) because court can take forever and right now there is a lot of anti-United momentum that he can use against the airline to get a better deal.

Nice! The fact that this come so close to the leggingsgate fiasco also works in this guy’s favor. They will probably settle (if a suit is filed) because they don’t further embarrassment.

Fair point. But while I think the leggings rule is stupid, I think they had a better case there versus this one. The fact that physical violence was used really hurts United, especially since they were the ones who overbooked.

As a lawyer, I say yes they did.

And usually there are people on standby, so if people fail to show up there is a decent chance that the seat gets used.

I 100% agree.

Is this a rule though? I feel like it is irresponsible to get police enforcement involved when the man paid for his ticket and had every right to be there. It wasn’t his fault that United overbooked.

Supposedly he was kicked out, but he still attends meetings and gets to keep his special security clearance...so I think this might have been for show.

And planes were able to use the runway today (via Reuters) so what did we really do?

And the economy added only half of the projected jobs in March... so much winning.

And why/how would McCain even pull this off?

He failed to run it by Congress and the State Dept...

He sucks!!!!!!!

And it was pre-recorded, easier to edit that way. Plus, mar-a-lago isn’t capable of doing live broadcasts...

Congress wouldn’t vote to authorize the attacks and what Trump did violates the constitution.

Nicely done!!!!!

A large part of the reason trump is president...

I know someone at the NSA and when NSA employees are polygraphed, they ask about what type of porn you watch.