Absolutely. I’m tired of hearing this nonsense about his communication strategy he is, how he’s able to gauge the pulse of his followers, how he knows how to goad his naysayers, and so on. All of these require complex thought, planning and a teeny bit of self-awareness. He is pure ID. He is, quite literally, incapable…

I think it’s a risk vs reward thing.

The dude has been lying about everything so long, he doesn’t really remember what truth is anymore, or keep straight what he’s told other people and what he actually believes himself.

Are all of these last gasp desperate plays because of the mounting investigation?

I’m calling it.

As an attorney, the method for bench bullies I was always taught was to say, “You’re Honor, if you’re going to hold me in contempt, I demand that the charges against me be particularized on the record as proscribed in the Judicial Canon, that a hearing be set on notice of no fewer than thirty days as due process…

Women have successfully reduced men to their genitalia

The issue with that reasoning is that it’s a case of a sex crime and because of under reporting - women also rape men, and men rape men, and women rape women. Because of the sexual nature of the crime, you see people raping the sex that they’re attracted to. And, because of under reporting, men are even less likely to…

Didn’t she testify in a court of law that he didn’t rape her?

Or that rape only occurs as man on woman, not woman on woman, man on man, or woman on man.

Yes, because it is always a war. Always you vs. me, forever.

You didn’t know social/public opinion out weighs any court of law. /s

But he is right. There is a vocal set of people who are committed to “believing survivors/accusers” based on nothing other than the fact that they have accused someone of sexual assault. This describes many commenters here on Jezebel. It ignores any interest in finding the actual truth and is a bananas way of going…

Amen. Sanity.

Waaaaaiiitttt. Why do you still believe the women if a trial was carried out by professionals and the man was judged by a Jury of his peers, and was deemed to be not guilty of the charges leveled against them. What else could he possibly do to prove he is not guilty? Do the people who claim to believe accusers know…

Regardless of everything else, who the fuck thinks a hand job isn’t a sexual encounter? You have a dick in your hand, lady. I mean, really!

I wish they felt supported enough to be completely forthcoming. The Crown could have easily brought expert witnesses to explain why the women's behaviour afterwards in contacting him was not unusual. I feel like the judge actually believed them but his hands were tied because they lied on the witness stand. And if you…

I had SO MANY SELF RIGHTEOUS born-again high school friends who were against pre-marital sex. Except when they did it it was okay because it was Twu Wuv and they were for sure going to marry him so it’s almost not even pre-marital sex, right?

As a former Marine, I’ll have you know that’s called, “basic training.”