@Rory Blanks: I can't even read it straight to the end.
@Rory Blanks: I can't even read it straight to the end.
@Bucky Rodgers (4:19 . . . close enough): Well thanks - you are invited, I guess I could find room for one more!
@einszweidreiviele: Actually I had thought of bringing it in, but that would have ruined the view from my penthouse.
@usedtowork: Right on! Less MHz, less memory, and less disk space, and while we are at it, less disk rpm's (4200, that is just what the doctor ordered) - but not zero rpm's, lest someone thinks of putting an SSD there.
@koberko: Not when apparently you were earlier very much ready to cut the corners elsewhere.
@supergeek1694: Maybe this one is using some saved resources that could have been better spent back then with better maintenance / mechanics / whatever related to those flap indicators. Eh?
So... will this come to CURRENT Android tablets? Will 1.x / 2.x apps be compatible with it? Will Android 3.1 be presented on a "Google-made tablet" a couple of weeks after 3.0 is released?
Better having unexpected luggage and a short memory span than an unexpected landing, eh?
@LoveMeSomeCode: Guys, guys - I repent. I'm sorry I made such a comment. Having used the thing and having found no real use for it "as free" and having considered it way too expensive "as paid", it does not mean that everyone must / should follow trend.
@Thad E Ginathom: Of course.
@Settings: Thad E Ginathom is right
@roblema: I guess I'd rather leave the thing as is. Subtle, as our friend above put it.
@Almightywhacko: On that aspect (the multi-purpose), indeed the Victorinox can't be beaten!
@Almightywhacko: I have one of those (from VictorInox, I think).
@Qwxptlz: Thanks.
@oli3: Oh you as well are going to tell me that the man landed on the moon with their feet straight, eh?