If you ate some food and did not realize that bleach had tainted it, you would sue also, because you would realize that bleach does not just pop up from no where, therefore someone is responsible. This not Pre-colonial Britain where we have unwritten laws. Being ignorant of the law is no excuse to break it. We should…

Then creating laws to govern how and what can be should definitely be in place if you fear litigation. If you follow the laws then you should not have to deal with the consequences of breaking them.

The compensation you are receiving is the LACK of fine after you poured bleach on food.

Or you could tell your local grocer to not to pour bleach on edible food or lock dumpsters. Which is why France was even able to pass this law. If you can watch someone go hungry then pour bleach on food that they could eat you deserve to get fined.

Take a look at whats going on in Santa Cruz CA. This is a city hat will run you out of town for not having a home. They have laws on the books like you cannot sit on the sidewalk, you cannot be near the window of a restaurant, and your dog can not be out passed 8:00. Some people dont want change and will you their…

A Diabetic perhaps.

It would be sensible and humanitarian to just let people get the food out of the dumpster without pouring bleach on it first or intentionally making it so it cannot be used. Why spend money redistributing food that has already been distributed? Oh because the people that can afford it would feel upset because other…