So you trolling or never seen the Sandlot?
So you trolling or never seen the Sandlot?
Did you ever accidentally hit a ball signed by the Babe into Rex’s yard?
If it bounces of the players glove or Jose Canseco’s head, is that on the fly?
You don't put a touch of sour cream on anything, the correct portion is always a dollop.
Egg salad with lettuce, tomato and peppers. Fried egg sandwich should have bacon, but would be good with mushrooms and peppers or as you described.
Because it’s not about having a comprehensive understanding of the game. The rule is based on specific corporal actions, not the player’s frame of mind or some other voodoo. If this were a judgment call based on intent then sure, you’d want more context. But I’ve watched 1000s of games over the last 25 years or so and…
Not enough excitement in the suburbs these days I guess. Keep being so real, pal.
I’m talking about the preposterous claim that having watched the whole game gives some level of enhanced perspective or authority as to what happened.
Your pearls sufficiently clutched?
It is a bullshit rule, but this is 1000% the right call under the rule. Even if the contact was completely accidental and incidental and inconsequential he slid past the bag without making an attempt (i.e. reach for) to stay on the bag. So your understanding of intent, to the extent that you gathered such by watching…
How did watching the game in its entirety give you a better perspective on that play?
Anyone who knows anything about the law knows that cases where one party “knows” they are going to lose (and “lose” is fluid on appeals, FYI) either are decided without arguments/trial based on summary judgment or are settled. Sorry that someone told you otherwise.
And butter
Yeah I checked and it's still there - now off you go to occupy something because reasons
I’ve rarely read something so stupid from both a logical and common sense perspective. Congrats dumbass, get back to the drum circle with your peers!
Because someone burned their own couch and some asswhipe? Much worse things happened in Philly last night that were completely unrelated to the game.
Eh, he got hit a lot harder back in 2007. He will be fine.
“I don’t think a group of black people have ever had something so bad happen to them”
Was this because of something on the field or did he just elbow him because he had an opportunity to do so? Doesn’t really matter, but some context would be appreciated.
Respectable point, but paid by who? And on some level when you are asking for money to do something it is about the money. Saying it’s not about revenue generation out of one side of your mouth and then saying they should be paid more because they are “better” out of the other is a bad look. The US Women’s Hockey Team…