Wait, wait—HOW many shades of Grey? I was thinking around 50 …
Wait, wait—HOW many shades of Grey? I was thinking around 50 …
And here I always figured I'd taste like chicken.
You shouldn't resort to hyperbole. They're worse than Satan!
Or perhaps they simply have a poorly calibrated, sorry excuse for a monitor.
It's the light. If you saw it in person, it would obviously be royal blue in color.
Hence, the far cooler-looking (right? RIGHT??) keytar.
I was actually kind of impressed with her in Twilight as well—she took a nothing character whose defining traits are passivity and a desperate need to be liked/validated by hot guys, and clearly worked hard to twist the character as written into something a bit more self-respecting and self-directed, which can't have…
Yes.
Yeah, I finally understood why the Grammys are the way they are when there was a similar feature in a recent EW, interviewing various Grammy voters on how and why they voted as they did. Their reasons for voting ranged from because their 4-year-old liked it, because it was "the stupidest and the most partying"…
I feel you. I don't think I'll ever be over the last guy I fell for, either.
Sincere.
That's just terribly romantic …
Thank him—he saved you from seeing the once-awesome show also mimic the landing of the Hindenburg. But I am sorry it sounds like he ruined the good seasons for you, too, alas.
Aw, the poor guy looks fine, like maybe he simply has resting "not into it" face. <—*can relate, as you can see*
It's the same basic bear!
Maybe with the wonders of CGI technology, he could be the Greek chorus/peanut gallery standing in the room during the sex scenes and interpreting the inner monologue of her inner goddess for the audience thusly.
I don't generally mind spoilers, but I agree with you—no one I talked to about it was willing to reveal the twist in A Beautiful Mind, such that when I finally saw it years after it came out, my mind was blown. That's such a cool (and rare) experience, and something really special about movies if its makers can pull…
I'm with ya. In fact, I find I enjoy something more if I know the spoilers—then I can settle into enjoying everything about the way it's made without fretting about whether where it's going will piss me off/be deeply unsatisfying/completely fail to make sense/etc. But that might just be the film major in me talking …
I'm sure I won't be the first, or last, person to tell you Star Trek: The Motion Picture is both a must-see and also essential for even beginning to comprehend the second film.
I really struggled to make it through the series (and love sci-fi and fantasy generally), but for me it finally got going with Two Towers, where Fellowship was the one I felt was bogged down in too much detail ("they went through this kind of wood with these three kinds of vegetation, up, then down, around to the left…