burps25
burps25
burps25

I’ve seen him a couple times. Maybe 3-4 years ago we sat in the third row and I got a bit of frozen blueberry on my shirt when he did something similar with a smoothie and co2. The people right up front were given ponchos and they got covered.

You can see the guy doing stuff that the average player can’t do, like opening gates. Hence “appears” though, he may just be a very savvy user.

The user appears to be an admin, I don’t know how likely it is that he happened to have a viewer who also played this game back in the day, but who knows.

That’s a pretty bold statement. With Sony bringing out their own VR platform I highly doubt that’s true. I guarantee that the AAA developers are reticent right now, but they want to see what kind of install base they are looking at first.

Ha...there was also people back in the day that believe no one would want to shop online either...

Definitely not Walmart’s fault in the scenario I described. Not any different than if you were to just stuff something in your pocket and walk out of the store. It’s more deceptive because you go through the normal motions of paying for something, but still equally against the law.

Monopoly, being a game and not reality, has its own set of ethical and statutory guidelines.

Knowingly exploiting a loophole to obtain products you did not pay for is still a crime. Those people were paying for lottery tickets that had XXX% wining rate, but were receiving tickets that had a higher winning rate.

a lot of immigrants have advanced degrees from their home countries but don’t have the opportunities to enter their field here.

“To make the tune go backwards, you could still drive the car forwards.”

Fact: If you drive over it slowly in reverse it tells you to worship the devil

But in the end, the spacing worked out and the road plays the song for all those who choose to drive its speed limit.

The road should know who you are from your car VIN, then it should use adaptive rumble strips to read out your Facebook whatever, emails, etc.

The idea of a ‘dirty bomb’ is more scary on a imaginary level that it would be in reality. Radioactive material is mostly only dangerous when inhaled or ingested. Spiking a few office water coolers with strontium, polonium or even radioactive phosphorus would be a far greater disaster than using most any radionuclide

I suspect that the primary effect is psychological. The mere mention of “dirty bomb” is enough to send people into apoplexy. I doubt it would even have to have much, if any, actual radioactivity. But if a suicide bomber were able to somehow get some of the radioactive pudding you eat before standing in front of an NMR

My guess is that if it’s radioactive enough to be effective, maybe it’s fairly easily detectable.

Yeah, people don’t realize that not all radioactive material is created equal.

Doesn’t even have to be a nuclear bomb in the sense of causing the trademark mushroom cloud. A “dirty bomb” is just as bad...

Medical radioactive components for research and cancer treatment are extremely radioactive and will kill people who handle it. X-ray sources to a lesser degree and it would be hard to procure a large amount.

I'm not implying that PA types are always wrong. As I noted in the post, "[It] risks pathologizing compliant defiance in the face of authority, whether it be work-to-rule actions, the Occupy Movement, or (sadly) a potentially abusive home or work environment." I realize that PA can be useful tool in some contexts.