I couldn’t believe that they confirmed him. It was and is still insane to me that he is making judgments that apply national law to women’s issues when he has a documented bias against women.

Is there anything more useless than a couple of thin-minded, bubbleheaded twentysomethings sharing their ignorance about one of the most well-documented events of the late 20th Century?

Wait. They fired a supporting character but not the star, so... SEXISM!

No, any “social consequences” that mindless twat is suffering are clearly deserved.

You seem like an idiot, but in hopes that it will help: find an adult and have him/her explain the principal of Freedom of Association to you.

Wow. What an egregious mis-use of the Title IX protections. Title IX applies to the education provided by the university, and is no way binding on student groups. I hope Sigma Chi sues, and wins.

You are remarkably stupid.

They could apologize, and the dipshits such as the author of this post would shriek “Apologies aren’t enough! We demand payment”

The correct answer is “Nothing.”

You’re not very bright, are ya?

You clearly have emotional problems, so I hesitate to engage with you. I wouldn’t want to set you off and have you start cutting again.

I get that you think you’re being clever and incisive, but you’re not.

The problem with that, obviously, is that the child isn’t in the woman’s body “against her will.”

Great news, thanks for sharing!

Ah, sluts. Thank goodness for sluts.

Ayn Rand was a terrible writer, woman or not.

Good.

Are you aware that you’re a complete fucking moron?

Feminism is ridiculous, and dangerous.

You have emotional problems.