This post will be really sad to read if we end up in a civil war first.
This post will be really sad to read if we end up in a civil war first.
Ever since the mcdonalds coffee case, people will see a headline like this and reflexively say NUH UH JUST LEARN YOUR CAR DUMBASS, and usually it’s more complicated.
In periods of my life where I’ve driven multiple cars with different sided fuel doors regularly, I knew about the arrow and still forgot to check it all the time.
A lawsuit is a long process that can be thwarted by a defendant destroying evidence before you know it exists. There’s no rush getting that started. The most likely reason to wait on something like this is that there is another similar lawsuit happening that might be turning up evidence you can use that you don’t have…
It’s like the dump trucks that say they aren’t responsible for broken windshields. Disclaimers are there to convince people who don’t have a lawyer yet not to pursue it.
The dump truck also says “not responsible for broken windshields” but they still are because it turns out you can’t just assert something like that for funsies.
I love how all the weird-ass experimental interchanges still lose to the plain old stacked interchange, as seen on half of the big-ole-turnpikes in America.
Flashbacks to all the crazy shit I’ve built in TTD.
Like most people, I’ve been chewing on the flying cars concept my whole life, and this is basically it. The best I can do is come up with a scenario where a breakthrough makes air/ground travel cheaper and someone props up some kind of air equivalent of taking a train in from a suburb. Then that starts to fly people…
Individual polls day to day are never reliable, like weighing yourself at different times of day. You want to look at averages over time.
Both of them just thought they could make it and the PT Cruiser realized in time that it wasn’t gonna happen.
Both drivers thought they could beat it. One of them aborted mission in time to stop. I’d bet a hundred dollars there’s a nice big flashing light out of frame to the right.
The status quo was: A rule is in the pipe and will gain force soon
Obviously I don’t know your exact situation, but once you’ve been serious for a year or two, and you’re both grown adults, it’s generally safe to start giving gifts “from both of you”. You definitely don’t have to be married for that.
Well, I guess I just found another blind spot. I’m a white liberal and when I saw that on my feed, I chuckled and didn’t give it a second thought. It’s effectively aimed at people like me, though they obviously didn’t mean it to be. Probably because people like me were the only ones in the room at the time.
Stimulants make anxiety worse. He could be using Benzos to chase that down, getting into a vicious cycle.
I think they’re going to rule for the baker, but I think they’re going to lay down a new test or draw some new distinction for commercial art, and I’m not sure that we’ll hate it. I think the baker is going to end up just barely passing the test they create.
They can, but that adds to the cost and the complication. It ends up being cheaper for the government to just keep throwing more money at the imminent domain process and eventually get the land they want.
I found your problem. You’ve got an incorrect idea of the above.
Most people keep them up 2-3 weeks.