please FOIA request all of his emails, to see if he actually is telling the truth.
please FOIA request all of his emails, to see if he actually is telling the truth.
If you look at the detailed views of each there's more at play like textures and shadows, but yeah, pretty much
Down in Antigua when you go swim with sting rays there is a barracuda there as well, they call him Barry. Good thing I didn't see this video before going there.
not really resolution, because bigger screen size would equal more resolution. It's more dpi or ppi, which is why a "retina" display is what it is. The dpi is so high you physically can't discern one pixel from another
but he's not trying that kick if the keeper isn't standing on the 6
As someone who has a vote, this.
Counterpoint, maybe belichick made the smartest coaching decision, knowing that if he had called a timeout someone in the seahawks huddle would have convinced that idiot to not make the worst play call decision of his life.
still think it isn't a model X? (It's hard to do an overlay without knowing the exact perspective of the video, but I think this shows it pretty well. Also, the overlay is one of the original renderings, not an actual photo of the model x, so some of the dimension may have changed at production):
I mean, I agree that drm is bullshit, but you're getting some things a little mixed up. When you buy a song on iTunes or book on Amazon, you are actually only buying a license to that work. You do not technically own it.
wonder if he's paying royalties on the ebow patent
yeah i did, and it's still an ebow knockoff
this was cool the first time it was posted today: http://gizmodo.com/watch-a-rotten…
anything for a headline/click. I wouldn't have clicked if the headline was "guy rips off 35+ year old guitar technology"
it's actually the complete opposite of "defying physics" right? because it is using the laws of physics to work?
yeah, this is an ebow knockoff.
YES, I JUST LIKED YOUR COMMENT FROM 2 YEARS AGO. someone linked to the article here: http://gizmodo.com/whats-the-most…
um, no i'm pretty sure I understand it. The fact that you are using a low bitrate to fill a 1080 resolution will result in much less quality because that limited data has to give instructions to all 1920x1080.
Are you Chad Ford? Or an intern as espn?
frank beamer steals childs milkshake
The fact that we think 5mbps for an HD video feed is acceptable really is pathetic. That's so compressed why even use HD resolution?