As much as I like Explorers, you should’ve went with the minivan.

You couldn’t go more than a mile without gobies trying to fill all its holes with sand or mudskippers trying to mate with it. 

I was loving this until the rear 3/4 view. Did they just completely forget to design the ass end of this vehicle?

Wrong. Libel in the United States is a very high bar to make. Not only does the writing in question have to be untrue, but the author (and this is the important part) has to know that it is untrue. So if Montana Skeptic genuinely believes that Musk is committing fraud, especially since from your own admission he knows…

You are not allowed to make anymore comments on legal matters until you learn how to spell suing correctly. You obviously know nothing on which you speak. Multiple people are offering multiple examples on why you are wrong and yet you continue on as if you are a voice of reason and expertise on this matter. You got…

Valid point. While not having near the impact on daily lives, I was talking specifically about how his actions are very similar to something Trump would do, but good call out.

And the proof is in the comments section of this article. 

No, that would be a liar. I think you need to go relook up the definition of troll. 

You can do more than one thing at a time. 

Ok? So because he is successful the threat of potentially spending millions of dollars in legal fees is no big deal now? 

No. I supported my arguments. You are asking hollow stupid questions that are answered IN THE FUCKING ARTICLE. The fact that you can’t understand what is being told to you, is your problem not mine. At this point you are either a troll or so incredibly dense, that it is futile to continue this conversation. I’ve…

I’m done talking to you. Read the article and try to use some measure of critical thinking and reading comprehension. 

Because an incredibly powerful and influential man just threatened to ruin his life. 

It’s in the article that he is very upfront about it! Does anyone read anymore??

Nothing. Nothing makes it ok.

It’s only shady if he doesn’t disclose it, and he is very upfront about disclosing it. Calling someone’s writing shady because he works for a firm that lent money to an oil firm is nothing more than an ad hominem. Critique what is in his writing, not who he works for. 

Interesting non sequiter. Article is about a CEO and founder personally threatening journalists, and you somehow turned it to be nothing but click bait because it doesn’t talk about inventory. 

It is both uncanny and unnerving at how closely Musk is beginning to mirror Trump’s actions and bloviating.

Leave Rick out of this

Yeah, you said what I was thinking, a helluva lot better than I could say it. Spot on.