Could you explain why this was directed at me?

It’s not good but it’s also not predatory - it’s adolescents being dumb.

“Whether it’s with yourself...”

having sex at 13 with other 13 year olds is not age appropriate. kids are too young to understand the consequences of sex at that age. full stop.

Being calm over the suggestion that 13 year olds having sex is normal is not a badge of honor.

I know a guy who lost his virginity at 14 to a 17 year old girl. He was totally fine with it...until he started drinking. Then he seemed not so fine with it.

W

Now that I’m older, it’s absolutely terrifying, poor girl was abused and no one did anything about it. not her parents, teachers, other adults, hell even me and the other kids in our class.

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if part of the intent of his remarks was to raise the specter of gays preying on kids. He’s a staggeringly self-hating gay.

We’re talking about victimizing white boys. Now it’s a problem.

Was just trying to articulate this, too. So apparently they do have a line (good, I guess?) but it can only be drawn when boys are threatened. And then after they are called out on it publicly. And only after some additional rationalizations earlier today. Way to be principled, guys!

It’s not. But that’s the hypocrisy. Women are sexual objects pretty much up for grabs as soon as men say so. But boys? Not the same. 

Good God. Do they ever hear themselves speak? TEN. TEN YEARS OLD but thank god “feminism” hadn’t yet ruined you.

Ugh. Didn’t even think about that, but you’re so right. Fuck this guy.

Grooming is exactly what they are describing. Like, to a T.

I know 13 year old boys. They’re still kids. Their bodies are bigger but they’re still kids in their minds. I noticed he didn’t talk about girls just boys. Frankly way to play into that fear homophobes have about gays targeting their children.

This is not an odd attitude for someone from the “manosphere”. Most of them believe grown-ass men should be able to have sex with any person who has hit puberty (or, at least, they used to—I don’t read their stuff anymore). For me, that was 10. Ponder that for a minute—I’ve argued with men who think I should have…

Yep. Where are all the concern trolls from the earlier articles on Milo at Berkeley who were decrying libtards for suppressing “free speech”?

Just remember: they felt all the other awful shit he said about racial minorities, Muslims, women, and LGBT people was just a matter of “free speech”. Apparently this is the thing that was too “offensive” for them and where they felt the need to draw the line in the sand, where they felt the need to “infringe upon his…

Interestingly enough they were apparently super cool with all his racism, misogyny, and transphobia. They had no problem when he called a Black woman an ape, or when he doxxed and risked the lives of trans women. They had no problem when he went around making false claims that trans women are just predators in…