burninatingalltheidiocy
burninatingalltheidiocy
burninatingalltheidiocy

My favourite Qeylis1 thread of the past two weeks of Future Earth was this one, wherein they

1) stated that “We have ice cores with 8000 parts per million of CO2.”
2) Was provided with a link saying that was off by ~7700 ppm
3) “Whoops. Upon further review, it was not ice cores, it was rock samples. It was something a

Right. And when you only believe Alex Jones’ side, everything looks like a government conspiracy.

If humans lessen our impact on the Earth, it will change things. It’s kind of a win-win, really.

Why did you waste your time writing your comment if it’s full of misinformation? Was it for the lulz? Are you getting paid to misinform?

Even if doing so changes nothing, I’d still prefer that humans lessen our impact on the planet.

Me take biology!

There’s multiple things wrong with your comment. Why’d you waste your time writing it (and our time reading it?) if it’s full of misinformation? Was it for the lulz? Are you getting paid to misinform?

And/or they don’t think biology is real.

And you need water to survive. Doesn’t mean you should go drown in a tank of it though. It’s all about the amount. Someone failed high school biology.

Heisensee, you are totally right. I never learned any chemistry ever. You got it.

I can’t tell if you’re being serious or not. Are you being serious?

That the Paris Agreement is as strongly-worded as it is (... and it’s not very) only happened because the two biggest elephants in the world of CO2 emissions (the USA and the PRC) both admitted that it’s a problem that they both have to work on. Every other COP meeting has contained one or the other working against