He’s a conservative political entertainer who knows exactly what he is doing.

You spell Johnny’s name wrong and you think 1917 is a Nolan flick?

I enjoy the contrast between KevyB’s well thought out explanation followed by your

“I’ll admit that in the past I’ve been angry that I needed to get up and go to the bathroom while playing a game or watching a TV show or movie.”

You’re on a roll with the garbage posts lately.

Moving the goalposts already?

Another nonsensical TadBravo take.

It is a bit odd. But this is a bit of an odd situation anywho of a “celebrity” doing such a blatantly stupid thing.

There's a special place in hell for these damned lying children.

“A bunch of randos on the internet automatically..”

Nah, we’re right because you are naive and by your admission, you don’t know what you are talking about. It is well known that Sony does not own all Spiderman rights across all platforms. If Sony did, they wouldn’t have to negotiate toy sales with Marvel... there is plenty of evidence to see how Sony handles the…

By your admission, you don’t know shit about Spiderman rights, contract law, or contracts, but you just have a hunch.. that it’s something contract related?

So you’re saying..

Well, it was posted many times in this comment section and there are articles on the internet pointing out that Sony does not own the Spiderman video game rights so therefore.. it’s not a rights issue.

yeah the contract is probably Sony going ”we will pay you a shit ton of money to make this content exclusive to our system”

...but they don’t.

By your own words you are saying you get more by owning a Playstation which means if the consumer wants “more” they have to potentially buy a whole new console to get more from a cross platform game. This is anti-consumer which is by definition: anti-consumer not favorable to consumers : improperly favoring the…

Sony doesn’t own the videogame rights, though.

Almost everything you said is wrong.

Did you make that up?