Why is it that half the time Grammar Nazi's try to correct someone else's grammar on the internet, they turn out to be wrong? It's embarrassing. And what is more embarrassing to me is that 333 people did not see what was wrong with this correction.

This is a good stylistic guideline, but it's not applicable here—his rampage was entirely insane, but it was not entirely masturbatory. Though you may be more interested in the masturbation (and hey, who isn't?), it was only a small part of the rampage and so carries less importance than the adjective "insane." As for…

I want to meet her so badly, if only to say- "Excuse me, I'm sorry to bother you, but I just have to tell you: I love you(r voice)."

She's Greek. We have olive oil flowing in our blood, keeping our skin youthful.

Is this a shirt? This is really, really short. She has great legs, but something about the hemline/look of this dress looks really weird.

This is why most attempts at "progressive" doll line for girls fail. They focus more on sending a message, but they ignore actually making the toy fun and interesting, so the toys either don't offer anything new or they don't offer something that little girls would actually want. If a company wants to make…

I know right? My barbies were simply supplied with things like an action mans jeep. For non barbie related play my brother and i had a whole series of action figures (the line of which i can't remember, i hope they're still in the house somewhere) with swords and shit. Then there were the actual wooden swords...

Also…

I read that as "Her bestie bought a Madeline Albright doll..."

There are tons of great, gender neutral STEM toys. Snap circuits, knex, legos, rainbow loom, tons of science and craft kits, and all kinds of awesome.

I don't know why, but this seems like something I would like, but it just annoys me. I think the fact the being #notapinkgirl is such a huge part of their schtick. I'd rather see something defined by what it *is* —like those women in science lego sets. There's no need to hate on dolls or girly things, just give…

I'm not big on throwing shade at others pastimes, and I understand it's fully legal, I just don't understand how anyone can look at something that majestic in nature and be like, "I should kill that fucker"

I missed "Look at Me" last week and now totally have the horrors. Will be obsessively checking door locks for the foreseeable future.

Your guy is probably funnier.

Wat. No. I think you're thinking of right wing evangelicals, unless your association with Catholics is mainly 90-yr-olds who think life was better pre-Vatican II.

not exactly. The biggest proponents of creationism in the US are Protestant sects, including baptists, pentacostals, etc.

You're completely wrong on that.

I'm so confused by everyone's sentiments on this. I went to catholic school for 12 years and we were ALWAYS taught evolution. They always told us that Catholics don't take the Old Testament literally. That's only some Protestants. Was I lied to by dozens of teachers, nuns, and priests!?! I haven't considered myself…

Don't forget Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics pre-dating Darwin — and a Catholic friar!

Love this and stealing it! But I'm not giving you or your mom any credit. Because life's not fair.

Me and my sister learnt fairly early on never to try the "not fair" argument. My mother would reply with a more or less identical speech of "You're pretty, that's not fair. We live in a big house, that's not fair. You're English, that's not fair. You'd better hope life doesn't get fair."