IMO the fun in playing against little kids isn’t just in being better than them, but in the PHYSICAL DOMINATION. You don’t really get that in baseball, sure maybe you crush some 11-yo’s best pitch to the moon, but laying out Lawson when he tries to go over the middle and then straddling his body while giving him the…

That some schools are basically think tanks (George Mason) and that some fellowships are just pundit welfare doesn’t mean that most policy schools, students and faculty aren’t doing valuable research and education.

I don’t see a ton of sympathy for SBN’s writers here. They knew the deal, and while the deal may turn out to be illegal, they didn’t have a problem with it then, and unlike say McDonalds refusing to pay minimum wage, there’s plenty of grey here.

Counter-counter-point: Heat death of the universe is the only season that matters.

Alternate proposal: If you have more than X in wealth, you can keep your money or you can have kids. HamNo can decide what X is.

Why would we not want to fund public policy education? To ensure our future policies are written with no actual understanding of how government works?

You. I like you. My pedants group meets bimonthly on Thursdays. I leave it to you to decide whether we meet six or 26 times annually.

Harvard’s endowment is $37.6 BILLION WITH A FUCKING B. They don’t need Chester Richworth Pennington IV’s $50 million so Chester V can attend.

You fucked up the math explaining amortization:

I disagree. There are no dumb questions. But there are a lot of dumb fucking people who ask questions.

Fewer, no they don’t, and how little is going on in your own life that HamNo receiving not that many comments (in your mind) is the thing from which you draw satisfaction?

I also enjoy reddit.

Narm! Naarm! Narm.

This works, but a simpler hack might be:

Sounds like exactly what the eye-protection industry would say.

There’s a long way between irresponsible journalism and libel.

Creating ratings by describing something accurately is not illegal nor is it libelous. To reiterate, it is not libel for the media to be biased. You may find their reporting poor journalism but unless they knowingly presented actual falsehoods (not just calling something in a way the manufacturer dislikes) it is not…

Bias isn’t libel. Describing a product in a manner other than the official company name for a product is not libel.

No, it isn’t libelous. The product is in fact pink. One could reasonable consider it slimy. Nothing untrue about the description. That it’s unappetizing as described is not libel.

Yeah, that’s still not how libel works.