I think they’re working on some new Zelda games for the 35th anniversary this year. They have the N64 and Gamecube remakes in the vault. I doubt that we’ll see all four, but who knows?
I think they’re working on some new Zelda games for the 35th anniversary this year. They have the N64 and Gamecube remakes in the vault. I doubt that we’ll see all four, but who knows?
Dolphin runs on Android, or you can just get a big battery pack and shove your Wii U in your backpack. That’s portable.
I mean, making a mouse that has absolute position vectors would be a fairly trivial engineering task I think. A bunch of companies already use this technology and it would also be trivial to calculate absolute position with existing mice technology if you used software calibration (you just would have to re-center and…
So, if you received the money by direct deposit, are you still owed a $2000 check?
You’re arguing in bad faith because you’re not applying the principle of charity. You could just as well argue that because Biden promised checks and you received a direct deposit, you’re still owed your “check”.
Well, zero dollars for the vast majority who received their money by direct deposit. If you’re not applying the principle of charity, you’re arguing in bad faith and your argument should be ignored.
When did Biden ever explicitly promise that $2000 checks was exclusive of the stimulus payments that had just been sent? I mean, by your reasoning, since most people received their money by direct deposit, they’re still owed their “checks”.
Um, Iraq was already in the “crosshairs” since the Clinton administration, cause, you know, the whole mass genocide and defiance of UN weapons inspector thing. Bush named it as part of the “axis of evil” before 9/11. Saddam Hussein was already reviled as the Hitler of SW Asia.
When did Biden every say that the $2000 was exclusionary of the $600 check? What’s your source?
In my state (California) recording a private conversation without the consent of everyone involved is eavesdropping, which is both criminally-prosecutable and a civil violation. Just holding a phone out in front of you doesn’t constitute explicit consent and there’s no guarantee that you can prove it was implicit…
I mean, you can only do what you can do. Servicemembers still have their first amendment rights to believe what they want to believe. All you can do is set a policy based on how people act and be serious about enforcing it.
I mean, I don’t agree with your reasoning, but I do agree that just canceling a large amount of student debt is basically a huge gift to the middle-class, people who tend to be significantly better-off than average in society. It doesn’t do much for the people who are suffering the most, the poorer black and Hispanic…
I mean, if that’s the extent of DC law, then DC law is clearly unconstitutional. While DC law can probably regulate the transfer of ammunition into DC, the full faith and credit clause and the commerce clause likely prevent DC from prohibiting possession of ammunition that is lawfully being transited through DC. At…
This is whataboutism, pure and simple. People should condemn violent rioters and looters at other protests. But that’s not what happened on Tuesday nor is it relevant to what happened on Tuesday.
That’s not what happened though, as far as the news is currently reporting. The attorney Throckmorton said that the bomber spoke of the military and bomb-making and that he thought he was capable of building a bomb. The attorney also claimed that the girlfriend had threatened to kill herself several times. But he…
I’m curious what you think here then. Do you think that a judge should issue a search warrant simply because one or more people claim to have overheard someone discussing a possible crime? Because that seems to be a pretty low standard of evidence. Like, if I don’t like my neighbors, I could claim that I’ve overheard…
It’s often the case that mentally-ill people end up in relationships together, as may be the case here.
The story was that she was sent in for a psychiatric evaluation. That’s only done if there is probable cause that someone is an immediate threat to themselves or other. It sounds like she was considered an immediate risk of self-harm.
It says she was held for a psychiatric evaluation. That is only done if there’s probable cause that someone is an active threat to themselves or others. It sounds like she was suicidal.
Everyone wants to be Monday-morning quarterback, but it sounds like their only witnesses were a severely mentally-ill girlfriend and her attorney. The story they told seems to have presented no direct evidence of any crime. Nobody saw any bombs he had built, any materials he had ordered for bomb-making. They just…