If by “effectively” you mean telling Congress to go fuck themselves because they literally have zero legal right to his taxes...then yeah.

Think about what you just wrote...

The problem is that Congress has no actual right to the President’s taxes, regardless of what past Presidents have done.

Meanwhile, the New York Times just admitted the Steele Dossier was full of “Russian Misinformation”.

I’m just trying to figure out how ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and PBS collectively must have a combined audience smaller than that of one network (FOX)?

So Fox is watched by the majority of voters?

I’ve a got a better idea - give every student a super=soaker. Soak the dog shitters til drenched. Every time.

Arm every student with a super-saoker....

Many problems can be difficult to solve -this one seems easy.

Thanks you racist douche.

Further proving the intellectual paucity of the average legal mind, you completely mis-understood the context of my statements on commerce and IP.

If you want to take the position that Russian facebook ads and the like changed Clinton voters into Trump voters, you’re going to have to prove that.

Ha, you really didn’t like that I impugned your overrated profession.

He didn’t charge obstruction because the threshold under the relevant and appropriate statute cannot be met.

Nope. There is literally no limit to the number of people who can make as much money as they want -the available pool of money is not, like a precious metal, limited.

No, you’re question was literally:

God willing when the Democrats have the whole government in two years,

Cool story, Bro.

There is no difference at all.

Yes, dimwit “actual attorney”.