You’recoming at it from the wrong angle.

Forgive the repost of my reply to Frank but I really want people to see this because I firmly believe this is the right solution - the same simple change that eliminated it could put it back.

...or teach....

*because it would be inconvenient*

we don’t need a third party:

No. Representation in the House as originally prescribed is the answer:

Forgive the repost of my reply to Frank but I really want people to see this because I firmly believe this is the right solution - the same simple change that eliminated it could put it back.

I agree but we don’t need more parties, we need the number of Representatives that were originally envisioned before the Republican limited the House to 435 in 1929

It is ALWAYS the losers that form these “project/groups”.

I get that there will be people who’d vote for Bernie/Warren, I’m asking is this an agenda that can take the election.

Meh, Obama ignored subpeonas and didn’t “make available” a variety of White House officials for 8 years.

This is funny. I love when famous people who have very similar cultural recognition among the public, don’t know who each other are.

Thank God Bernie will make sure this guy will still be able to participate in our Democracy by voting from prison.

Sanders/Warren

You left one out

“People forget that Clinton committed (and suborned) perjury about his affair”

Ha - I love Epstein, Bill loved that island more - possibly - then Bob Menendez.

Frank, you’re losing street cred here - you gota stay hip with the example man!

Oh you reminded me of an oldie but goodie...