I agree. Don’t give drugs to test people. Those poor dummies have a hard time focusing on their work, adding meth and stuff to that isn’t going to make their work easier.

I think that is the late evening sun casting an unfortunate shadow.

BUT the gap between the front and the hood is definitely not as it should be as on this grey car.

You get one star for his asshole

The license is just to avoid that someone jumps in an F1 car and thinks that this thing drives like an F2, F3 or Indycar and then crashes and kills someone in the very first corner because “Oops, this car does drive differently, in a race, than my previous cars”. While that might be acceptable in some regional touring…

For everyone replying with “but yeah how about gasoline” ; well ; anyone can put out a gasoline fire. With sand, foam and water. An electrical (battery) fire is a different beast. For sure fire brigades in remote areas aren’t equipped to fight such a battery-based chemical fire. Unlike gasoline. Use a shovel and you…

I agree here that electricity doesn’t help, especially in dry areas like Africa and the Mediterrean. If those cars catch fire then a whole forest can burn down.

EVs are the answer. Aramco doesn’t sell electricity. End of monopoly.

“Jan 21, 2022 — Natural gas is the main methane source for hydrogen production by industrial facilities and petroleum refineries.”

IMHO this isn’t a rescue boat nor a service boat. It has been made to be light enough to run on low power, but as soon as this thing hits some waves those foil gonna break and hard. On top of that those tanks are totally not adequate to stay up and running for many hours.

If you want to go green, then use sailboats…

If you drive 70 mph and you have to make an emergency stop and JUST managed to brake in time for an object in front of you, at what speed would you hit the object if you were driving 100 mph ?

Watch the video if you want to LEARN but here is the TL;DR

If you drive 100 mph then you’d hit the object at a whopping 71 mph.

Wh…

So you’d rather get hit by a car doing 80 mph or one doing 65 mph ?

So what is the actual problem? If it started just a few thousand miles ago then something has changed suddenly. Valve stem guides that suddenly can leak oil into the top of the cylinder? A seal on the crankshaft? Piston rings? Though those ‘suddenly’ start to leak. And even then ; why would that require a whole engine…

If we’re going to be scared of a 9000 lbs car then how about trucks? Semis? Those weigh weigh more, they drive just as fast in regular traffic and they can’t brake at all fast, let alone in a controlled way.

I think a Hummer EV is safer to drive than any 90s car that is still on the road with basic ABS and that’s it.…

You don’t need peak torque to cruise.

It’s pronounced Lotus SUV.

99% of the time consumer cars do not drive on the track so yeah no thanks, rather have a V6, V8 or V10 than some over-boosted 4 cyl.

Great that a Boxster is faster than a V10 R8. Go get that Boxster man!

Meanwhile the guys that rather prefer low rpms and rumbling exhaust notes will cruise in their 4.2 V8s or higher...

Why…

But but I am anti-anti-fa.

I am fa.

I am the good guy.

Dude, try getting that teabag out of your cup on the main straight within 12.7 seconds before the next corner makes its appearance... Now THAT is skill.

(I mean, without spilling a drop on your trousers)

Liquid gas doesn’t explode. There needs to be a proper ratio air/fuel mixture in a relative confined space before a spark can ignore that into a fireball.

Under a car ? Unlikely that will happen.

It shows that Ferrari did work hard already from the middle or even early 2021 on this new car. It’s good. It’s fast. But I do think RBR will catch up eventually, if they can already compete (pos2 vs pos1 for a long time in the race) while RBR did not really work on their car 2022 last year but instead was focusing on…