Oxygen deprivation, he can only say “Hodor”.

“Miitomo for iPhone”, you mean iphone and android? careful, your bias is showing.

And the Eternal Struggle between Gawker Media and Reddit continues. Seriously, give it a rest, also this:

This. Tidal’s recent popularity looks like it has nothing to do with Beyonce. They’re getting a bump from Prince’s death, because it’s the only place to get his song catalogue. I’ve been tempted, myself.

“The proof is in the meteoric rise of Tidal’s iOS app downloads since Lemonade was announced, and in its performance on pirate sites. At one major private site Lemonade isn’t even in the top ten for music downloads. In fact, it isn’t even in the top twenty (it ranked 21st for number of seeders).”

Is this another case of “well, android phone have better X than iphone, but benchmarks don’t matter”, until, well, iphones DO have better benchmarks, at which point it’s “ALL THAT MATTERS ARE THE BENCHMARKS!!” It’s silly to think that a game like Lara Craft Go is somehow unplayable at 45 fps.

> Android’s emoji are known for being just awfully designed. It’s not just a matter of style—in some cases they’re so different from other platforms that they can lead to some serious misunderstandings.

My iPads have all had keyboard support, way back to the original. It’s called “bluetooth.” No, this thing is an Air 3 with pen support and really, really good speakers.

“And keyboard support.”

yes

“Let’s duct tape an iPad to the center of the dash. Job done.” -Tesla

You should probably read the article before commenting on a Gizmodo post; the contents usually conflict with the click bait headline (which is the case here).

That’s a pretty interesting title you’ve got there, Kate, considering that when you look into the cases you see that:

The title of this article makes it sound like Google is knuckling under to the FBI, while in fact they are taking the same position as Apple. That doesn’t seem very fair, but I guess a fairly worded title wouldn’t have generated as many clicks, would it?

This makes sense. No one was arguing that the AWA was improper on its face. Apple has a history of complying, and if Google maintained the ability to access locked phones, they would be forced to comply.

Ugh, headline feels like clickbait as the actual article clarifies and shows why it’s different.