you substitute random dude, no one will bat an eye.

When the “open-door policy” is a new change to the bylaws as of 1/1/2018, no, the homeowners did not purchase the properties with that encumbrance in mind.

“Oh hello, nothing out of the ordinary here fellow neighbor.“

No one likes you.

I don’t work for the media. But if we’re being honest, a lot less flushed out accusations have been printed here and the NY Times. Anonymous accusations, vague accusations, etc... we’ve seen it all here. Many times those have also covered since deleted tweets.

I think the editors won’t let writers (such as Diana) who cover such things write about it. I know there was no settlement with Gawker, so legally it can be discussed. I’ve certainly seen posts on Deadspin with less accusations than some of the things she’s tweeted about her experience with Howard - and yes, she has…

Cool. Hey, guys, I found the representative of non-Americans everywhere.

uh oh here comes the screeching, very intimidating stuff over here.

The reporters don’t decide what is emphasized; they don’t pick the headlines

So the fact that the majority of reporters are liberal doesn’t give you any inclination that those worldviews may seep into reporting in some form or another? Your counter is just “nah the owners wouldn’t allow that” Well for the most part on a day to day, the owners don’t have a heavy hand into editorial decisions or…

They only have that level of influence because they are the only right leaning news station on TV.

It’s a curious thing how the left routinely denies the media is overwhelmingly liberal or, even if they admit that, deny it has any impact on coverage. But the moment some conservative expresses interest in one of their properties, suddenly there’s a shriek of outrage. How dare you threaten to make this left-leaning…

Glad that someone posted this. The SPLC did the same thing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a woman who has done more for women’s rights by herself than everyone working at the SPLC put together. It’s a damn shame. Nawaz and Ali get their names dragged through the mud because the SPLC seems hell bent on protecting ideologies and…

“The Quilliam Foundation’s stated mission is to combat violent extremism, and it’s buddied up with the British and American governments. In reality, their operations are far more opaque than that: They’ve been accused of “anti-Muslim extremism” by the Southern Poverty Law Center”

Meanwhile, directly below this post:

I am clickSucka and I approve this click bait

“Toxic masculinity.” what newspeak is this. why the hate on men and masculinity? Want me to talk about ‘toxic femininity’? I wouldn’t because I don’t think either is bad or toxic and both complement each other and are necessary for life as humans.

This, all of this. I mean so what if they call you a baby for playing on the easiest difficulty. How insecure are you about yourself that an insult like that actually affects you?

No, he claimed to be “peer pressured,” which potentially opens up a completely different can of worms, but I don’t think in this instance is demonstrably different from being “bullied.”

Because the last thing I want are devs listening to him and softening the edges on games because someone might get their feelings hurt by something like this. There is such a thing as being too sensitive. This is the exact point where we reach it. If Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a…