So promotions should continue the bias of the hiring before it? No. If you promote equally in a previously biased environment, it would make sense that the few women badass enough to get into the field against odds would be promoted more.
Burnburnburnt
burnburnburnt
Men when it happens to women: I guess you just weren’t qualified. Maybe they were worried about you taking maternity leave, that’s very costly for a company! Are you sure it’s because you’re a woman I mean your boss has a daughter I’ve never seen him do anything sexist. Sexism doesn’t even exist in the US anymore just…
Let the courts sort this out. Don’t worry your pretty little head about silly stuff like this. Sometimes life is like this doll. You mind getting me some coffee sweetheart?
5 positions.
Lol, ok.
I know how lawsuits work. I have no idea if this one has merit. And yes, I’m for equality, which means—stay with me now, ‘cause this one might hurt—some men are not going to get to be in the positions they want, because women will have them instead. So again, equality is going to look and feel “unfair” to a lot of men…
You never show empathy to us in the first place and now you expect us to give a shit. laughable. Besides these dudes still have to prove it was their gender that was discriminated against and not shitty attitudes at having a woman doing their job better.
The 20 -> 80% really needs more info. Was it only a 5 person team, and now instead of 1/5 being women, 4/5 are women? Or are we talking about tens/hundreds/thousands of jobs? Replacing 3 members of a team within 18 months could be legitimate, but if it’s thousands of jobs that’s another story.
I don’t give a fuck how I seem to you. You seem like a whiney little neckbeard. Do you own fedoras?
If you read farther down, it says “ The Mercury News notes that, according to Yahoo’s diversity reports, the percentage of women in leadership positions rose 23 to 24 percent between 2014 and 2015.” So somebody’s data is wrong. It could be that Yahoo was covering up a massive swing in which way the imbalance went,…
How many managers are there? What if there are 5 managers. Before 2 were female and now 4 are, but it’s actually only a change of 2 people. Is that still a ‘wow’? (I don’t know how many people there actually are, just pointing out stats can be misleading).
But not a problem anyone gave a shit about. Get over it. Men think when women talk equally in conversation they are dominating it. Get used to having females in leadership roles & don’t whine like a little baby. Suck it up buttercup.
Even if the decisions were gender-based (I can’t call this “sexism”—there is no matriarchy), it still couldn’t be called “horrific.” This guy can take his penis to every other company and get the gender-based favoritism he has come to feel he is entitled to. That’s how the rest of that world runs, so forgive me if I…
So where was this guy’s lawsuit when the top managers were 80% male?
Why wasn’t the 80/20 statistic shocking when it was 80 percent men?
So this is the dude version of that whiny red haired girl’s Supreme Court case, essentially?
The opposite has always been true: At least 80 percent of top managers being men. How come it’s a problem now?
IF IT WASNT A PROBLEM BEFORE WHY WAS IT A PROBLEM AFTER/ OH WAIT. THE SHITTY MEN WHO DO SHIT WORK WERE FIRED. POOR BABIES