buriedaliveopener
BuriedAliveOpener
buriedaliveopener

You’re an idiot.

I’m not a Hannity about anything, you fucking ghoul

You’re not pro-queer rights, you’re an anti-trans bigot.  Your primary concern when it comes to abortion rights is lecturing people about the right way to vote.  Do you care about shooting any Israeli’s who have participated in horrific war crimes?  

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/nov/17/john-fetterman-blueprint-democrats-win

Why should the rights of 7 million Palestinians living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea depend on whether a nuclear-armed state can “defeat” (whatever that even means) a militant organization of maybe 60,000 people?

Why should destruction of Hamas (whatever that even means) be a precondition to the end of Israel’s brutal oppression of Palestinians? Why should the rights of 7 million Palestinians living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea depend on whether a nuclear-armed state can “defeat” (whatever that even

Is that this website’s job?  Are you canvassing?  Phone banking?

Is there something in here that tells people not to vote for Biden?

Nah, I didn’t even read your comment as if you were saying Barbie and Top Gun were even the same level of quality.  I was just agreeing and adding some further thoughts, because I’ve been making the same Top Gun compare/contrast the last couple of days.

I see.  So that’s in service of defeating the hyperbolic argument I wasn’t intending to defend that Democrats “can” win everywhere if they hammer abortion.  

I think the comparison to Top Gun is fair, at least insofar as Barbie probably also only ended up a Best Picture nominee because of the expanded list, and is certainly “weaker” than the other Best Picture nominees (or is at least “weaker” than the others I’ve seen). I.e., it’s occupying the same role (box office and

I thought Lily Gladstone was phenomenal in Killers of the Flower Moon. She was subtle and nuanced, able to tell so much in every look. She did so well with a role that demanded she be constantly suspicious of people not only does she depend on but deeply cares about, especially Leo DiCaprio, and of showing the toll

Alright, glad we cleared that up.  (Although still don’t get your argument on Kentucky’s Fifth, unless it’s just you saying “Because Democrats lost badly there in the last election they probably can’t win there” which okay).

Thanks, as always, for your input, but I’m not OP. If you have an issue with their hyperbolic statement, not sure why you’re taking it up with me. While I agree 100% with OP’s sentiment that Democrats would be competitive, or more competitive, almost everywhere if they hammered on abortion rights, I don’t agree with

That’s not the blanket statement OP made. You can do whatever you want, it’s a free country. If you want to hide feckless cowardice behind a mask of feigned sensibility that fails to account for the fact that attitudes are fluid and dynamic rather than fixed and unchanging

You dismissed my first substantive reply to you. That’s why I dismissed you. Enjoy the taste of boot!

ok, sorry, didn’t realize i was talking to the person who knows all the inevitabilities in politics and how nothing ever changes anywhere ever, always an amazing story, the inevitability of everything

zero. I dismissed you because you dismissed one of my responses!

If Jezebel publicly criticizing Biden about this could cost Biden a meaningful number of votes, then he is already in serious trouble. Neither the uncovering of the issue itself, nor the criticism, originated with Jezebel. As you can see this was an article on the Washington Post (which I’m guessing has significantly

fuck off bootlicker