Came here to say this minus the ‘open air prison’ part,
BuriedAliveOpener
buriedaliveopener
What do they necessarily add to any story? What does any particular site add to any story? Rashida Tlaib is being criticized for continuing to fly a Palestinian flag outside of her office. That’s a thing.
Obviously not relevant to this article, but a major conflict erupted Saturday between Israelis and Palestinians, including the deadliest attack, by far, Hamas has ever scored, that has killed hundreds of innocent Israelis, and a devastating response by Israel that will probably kill multiples more Palestinians when…
“Men commit 90 percent of homicides in the United States and represent 77 percent of homicide victims. They’re the demographic group most at risk of being victimized by violent crime. They are 3.5 times more likely than women to die by suicide, and their life expectancy is 4.9 years shorter than women’s. Boys are far…
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-undermines-rapid-onset-gender-dysphoria-claims/?amp=true
https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/08/18/1057135/transgender-contagion-gender-dysphoria/amp/
“scientific fucking consensus”
“Again, this is not the scientific consensus.”
“faggot.”
“WHY DO YOU WANT TO TRANS CHILDREN?”
“Well, congratulations, you dug up one study that contradicts all known knowledge and decades of research.”
“Yes, dotard,[*] we were talking about a fucking 4-year-old.”
“However, 5- to 6-year-old participants knew that Big Bird was a man wearing a costume, as they had come to understand that the character violates physical reality.”
“Yes, it as functional as a creature can be who can’t physically distinguish between fantasy and reality.”
“You posted research about how awesome 4-year-old kids’ brains are”
“Why do you want to trans 4-year-olds?“
“ignoring the entire conversation/context”
“was if they could make decisions, plan, and see consequences.”