buriedaliveopener
BuriedAliveOpener
buriedaliveopener

But let’s get back to what you’re trying to deflect from and that’s the fact that Jezebel writers have made it a point to report on age gaps while opining that they are transgressive. Their arguments rely on a shallow and dangerous biological determinism, a defense of bourgeois morality, and classism.

fuck off moron.

fuck off you idiot 

I’ve read at least one of those (the Marx one). Nothing about why making fun of a middle aged man constantly dating 25 year olds perpetuates inequality. Care to summarize how the argument Marx is making applies?  (Feel free to copy and paste whatever earned you that C- in the Sociology of Gender or whatever). 

That’s the name of the book?

Please, recommend a book that will explain coherently why a couple of jokes at the expense of a rich middle aged man’s propensity for dating 23 year olds is awful or contributes to the patriarchy or whatever. Always happy to learn, maybe next time instead of being an insulting piece of shit, give the info you think is

thx!

Well, her first comments months ago were explicitly denying that. It’s hard to read her comments now as not denying that. If she’s expressing herself poorly, well, that’s still her problem, not anyone else’s. We aren’t mind readers, she’s been a performer/writer/public personality for decades, she should know how to

Nazis targeted those groups explicitly as part of their program to create a racially pure Reich. It was all part and parcel of their racial program. I don’t think anyone’s dying on this hill (except Whoopi it seems), it is just that Whoopi is straight up wrong about this in a way that is, frankly, offensive, even if

Remember who they were killing first. They were not killing racial; they were killing physical. They were killing people they considered to be mentally defective. And then they made this decision... You could not tell a Jew on a street. You could find me. You couldn’t find them. That was the point I was making.

Argument from authority can be fallacious when it’s the sole basis for your argument, especially when the “authority” being claimed is not really relevant to the argument. I’m not doing that. In my last post, e.g., I gave my own substantive reason for being against this guy’s appointment that had nothing to do with

I don’t know what an “ACAB Attorney General” is. No, I do not want a justice on the New York Court of Appeals (not the Supreme Court, in New York “Supreme Court” is the term for trial courts) who, in the only case that has ever come to him concerning abortion, joined an illogical opinion largely shielding an

Why does it matter what the British public perceive about the monarchy?  What does it matter to?

I don’t hate free speech.  

please explain how “wow looks like dicaprio can’t find someone his own age [insert joke here]” implicates “social reproduction and delegitimization strategies” but congrats on whatever you just googled.

First of all, it’s not a “serious claim,” you fucking dork, it’s saying this judge’s rulings make him more a more conservative judge than what a Democrat should be appointing to courts.  Stop acting like the guy’s being disbarred, you ass kissing nerd.

The View has employed the likes of Elizabeth Hasselback and Megan McCain, and yet “The Holocaust wasn’t about race” might be the single dumbest thing uttered by any view co-host ever.  As this article points out, you will not find a more race-obsessed group of people than Nazis in the 30's and 40's.

Maybe, and here’s a thought, you aren’t better able to actually analyze the import of an opinion you literally just found out existed a few days ago and probably just read (and barely understood) today, than 50 fucking law professors whose job this is. That the court didn’t by every single one of the CPC’s arguments

EDIT: Here’s the letter. Again, they cite only the discovery dispute.

Because that was a single trial-court DISCOVERY ruling. That a judge once ruled against the AG in a case tangentially related to discovery is not evidence that are anti-abortion. Judge rule all the time against both parties in discovery disputes; they aren’t about the merit of the case, and many times the loser of