Thanks!

Okay, but again I have never once been asked to sign a waiver for prescription medication, so I’m not sure this is the entire reason. 

I think she can both try to find a provider who will get her relief and put the shitty doctor/hospital on blast.

I think NY is a one-party consent state, so any participant to a conversation can record it.

I’m sure it’s not a big deal to sign a waiver, but I don’t even understand why a waiver is needed in the first place? I’ve never had to sign a waiver for any prescription medication I’ve had, no matter what the other side effects could be.

This tracks, since filing a lawsuit is the ultimate “Let me speak with the manager.”

If I was in charge of an organization, my anti-fraternization rules would be super strict. Depending on size, there would certainly be a “no nepotism” policy that would prohibit related people from working there, which would mean that people that if a couple working there got married, one would have to quit (this was…

Well, okay, I suppose that’s more a matter of judgment, but they seem to routinely cite the cell pings as damning evidence against Adnan. I’m pretty sure in the last episode when they are going through everything, the Leakin Park pings in particular are among the reasons the producer thinks Adnan, if he’s innocent, is…

Not to YOUR specs. I’m not the one who set the specs, you did. 

He said he felt betrayed by the filing of a motion mentioned by name —the singular and only purpose of that motion was to release a man from prison who should not have been put there in the first place.

It’s parsing and uncharitable to take the statement he did make, which did NOT say “Adnan should stay in jail,” and to read something like that into it, especially in light of his relationship to the case.  A reading doesn’t have to be a “strained reading” to be a parsing and uncharitable one.

It’s not that I don’t care, it’s that you made an assertion and then couldn’t back it up.  Sorry you suck at everything!

Okay, you can summarize the topline findings of an investigation, or you can look into the myriad problems that have been uncovered with regard to the investigation. You’ve chosen the path that has you defending a powerful person who, we know for a fact, fucked and married his children’s sister, someone who he had…

Yeah, I suppose you could read that provision to be saying that Leibert thought last year it was fine for cheerleaders to be underpaid, but now it’s not, but that’s not how I would read it. I suppose you could also read it to be Leibert making a demand that she naively thinks will be heeded now that it has been made. …

“He’s either drunk and high and incapable of even standing up, or he’s drunk and high and able to attack her, chase her, land blows? It just doesn’t make sense.”

I mean, if you look at it from his perspective, the prosecutor’s office that prosecuted Adnan and fought to keep him in jail suddenly turned around and filed a motion to vacate the conviction and free him without giving Lee’s family much, if any, warning at all. I can see how he feels personally betrayed by that…

Right, and I’m pointing out people probably already understand the basics of that dynamic, that the owners are probably paying cheerleaders less because they want to and because they can, and that they will only pay cheerleaders more if there pressure of some sort is applied to them. I think this article is making a…

What is the hot take? That he felt blindsided and betrayed by the prosecutors’ office? That seems like a pretty fair reaction. Or that he wanted the judge to do the right thing? But I guess you get to decide what you feel empathy for, and if you find it harder to find empathy for someone who has lost their sister…

It would be just a fair, living wage. Whether the NFL is a progressive organization isn’t really relevant.

So then certain labor doesn’t deserve compensation based on your own judgment it is more like a hobby than a real career?