Why do you think it’s anyone’s job to give a serious assessment of the middling late career output of a once great filmmaker who fingered his daughter? Are the merits of fucking Blue Jasmine really that important that someone who brings up Woody Allen has to bring that up alongside (or in place of??!?) him having…

A quarter of what is widely regarded as one of his best films, and maybe OP was expecting a filmmaker as well-regarded as Allen to be able to captivate them within a half hour. 

Abusing his daughter?  Or grooming, and then fucking and marrying his daughter’s sister?

Right.  How could anyone suspect the guy who, at that time, was fucking (and would eventually marry) his children’s sister, who he had known since she was the child of his long term intimate partner, of not respecting basic sexual boundaries?

woody allen is not going to fuck you

It’s amazing how the people with the least possible interesting things to say are somehow convinced they’re the biggest martyrs. 

lol!

The review is about the episode. What are you talking about?

Maybe you should either read a larger variety of reviews, seek out a reviewer that looks at it from a perspective more similar to yours, or just accept that some or many reviews are going to be approaching from a perspective different from yours, and either just not read reviews or take gaining a new perspective as a…

Not unfair, to be sure, but I also wouldn’t go out of my way to say that I was “not friends” with someone I had met and knew, and didn’t have any sort of acrimony with.  Seems gratuitously rude, if nothing else!

lol right what do you catch LIE trout

your username is dumb and you’ve probably never been fishing

You came all the way to the bottom of this thread to lecture a stranger about how they argue?  And you’re worried about how I’m doing?

I’m not going to fuck you either! Leave me alone. 

Lol, not a single word of this makes any sense!  What is the relevance of this to anything?  You are not nearly as cool or clever as you think!

Okay, great! I don’t think I ever said this film would meet whatever standard prevails for “fair use” under current jurisprudence, as I’m not an IP lawyer, and can’t speak confidently towards what that jurisprudence is. What I did say was that, under what I would consider reasonable application of reasonable copyright…

lol, jason sudeikis is not going to fuck you, and i have never, ever, in my life said he did a horrible thing.  later!

I mean, I think it can be both. Your point about this *maybe* being more satire that could use any vehicle to make its point than parody that is making fun of specific and art and therefore needs to use that art to make its point, is certainly well taken. Although I’ve read a detailed review of the movie, I haven’t…

This is not a reasonable interpretation of ‘Fair Use’ in any fucking world. I mean, by your definition here, Marvel Studios and Sony never had to fight over the rights to Spider-Man as Marvel could have just gone ‘Fair use’ y’all. Now I’m suddenly wondering why every single big movie studio isn’t just having their own…

I think what AOC would probably say is that men just don’t get treated in this way when they are testifying, not that women are too delicate to take it.