Multiple times even.  Which is why I wouldn’t castigate someone for doing something because “A fart has happened.”

Lol, who are you telling to fuck off? You realize this is not Wilde criticizing Pugh, right?

Lol, is that second quote real, or did you just record my 6 year old explaining why he likes video games?

Women die every day. 

Yes, when we’ve all “worked as long and hard” as someone born into wealth, privilege, and power they’ve never had to earn, maybe then you’ll allow them to opine on colonialism and oppression.  How kind!

Strikes me as straightforward and honest. I hope it’s not, like, printed in the funeral program or read as a eulogy, but it’s difficult for me to find much to gripe with in this article. What are you taking exception with?

Ooof, what a seemingly brutal article, but only because it is straightforward and honest where much of the press coverage will default towards hagiography. 

Great! I’ll stop defending Jezebel’s minor editorial choices from your bad faith, idiotic attacks, and move on, since I’m right. Great advice. Later asshole!

Who are the guardians of the greater good?  What are you talking about?

So blackface only “remotely looks like it could be offensive”?

Lol, glad I didn’t snark on you for your take like I wanted, because this is a pretty good comeback. 

If blackface is horrific, why show it?

Must be an easy life when you can just hand wave away absolutely legitimate criticism of anything you happen to like by just pretending that criticism has no legitimate basis. 

This is the lamest excuse for doing blackface in the 21st century. Everyone already understands that about blackface. No one needs some white person to use blackface to know that. The only purpose of using blackface is to shock audiences into laughter by displaying something obviously offensive. I, personally, do not…

First, I’m not sure why this argument is relevant. I responded to someone who accused Jezebel of “silence” by pointing out that Jezebel was not silent. I have no idea why you are demanding I defend the minutiae of Jezebel’s editorial decisions given that I am objectively right in response to OP, and OP is objectively…

So fucking what? One article does not equal silence, and the relative importance of a story is not necessarily reflected in the number of articles it generates over an arbitrary period of time. This is such a dumb criticism.

It’s not an unreasonable thing to ask someone to justify a thing they say, you fucking lunatic. Beyond that, your comment doesn’t make any sense and any point you could possibly be making doesn’t make any sense. There is no ahistorical revisionism going on. There is you, a misogynistic sexist asshole, demanding a…

Because it wasn’t clear what part of the article this comment was in reference to. It’s still not clear what the fuck you are referring to when you talk about “ahistorical revisionism,” nor what exactly your point is here. 

Anything a Christian doesn’t think people should have access to  

And we can all agree the Buscemi campaign was more creatively and commercially successful, right?