Same thing. You can’t call out someone and not provide any arguments. It makes your own opinions pointless.

It has been pointed out that Ecclestone is a massive asshole countless times before. Literally every person that visits this blog knows that,

It’s simple. You can’t say someone is wrong and then not explain why.

You still haven’t proven my criticism as wrong. Instead, you have posted an opinion.

try to prove my criticism wrong.

Except when it becomes a circlejerk. Because that’s what this is. Making articles that criticise Ecclestone in a blog where most of the readers already agree and support the said criticism.

Dictate? It’s called criticism, and every person who writes things for public consumption can (or should) expect to get some of it. Especially when done on a valid point.

Following that logic, we should bring up every single bad thing in society in every single topic that has the vaguest relation to it.

3 DNQs is not something to talk about. So technically, she didn’t race in the F1.

And this is even better:

McLaren safety car confirmed!

No comparison should be done. It should’ve been an article about a 80 year old woman driving an F1 car, and not mentions of Ecclestone, sexism etc. If they want to write about the latter topics, they should’ve mentioned what I wrote.

Welcome to the 21st century. How was your coma?

Kudos to her, but this doesn’t really prove anything. It would, had she set some respectable lap times.