Has it been announced yet whether he obtained the gun legally (as in, passed a background check even with domestic violence on his record)? I haven't seen it mentioned.

Have we reached a point where all cultural sharing is off limits? That seems so... stagnant.

I think that the joking tone of this post is only appropriate if the woman was out there due to her own choices. If she was a victim of someone else's actions, this would be in poor taste. At this point, I don't see enough data to tell. Therefore, I think restraint is called for.

Haisley did mention this in the article:

First, the writer notes that in the aftermath of the bombing of Turkey’s capital Ankara that took over 100 lives and injured more than 400 others just over a month ago, there weren’t any similar shows of solidarity during international matches

WOAH WOAH WOAH. My wife is Turkish and with that her family/friends are Turkish and I know many of them. One of her cousins posted this earlier today:

Agreed - and people are asking for a rematch. Why? How does Ronda deserve a rematch? The result wasn’t even close. Holms win was surgical. Ronda has massive holes in her stand-up, walking straight into punches with no footwork. Thats something you can’t learn in a few months let alone a year or 2. Anyone saying she…

Her adolescent psychological profile is physically manifested in the stupid, theatrical mean face she makes at weigh-ins and in the face off prior to the fight. I can’t imagine how she could remember the way she acted in the pre-fight without cringing in embarrassment after getting her ass so thoroughly handed to her…

It also seems like her previous opponents simply weren’t very physically strong. Holm is getting credit for better striking skills, but she also didn’t have a problem getting out of Rousey’s arm bar. She is at least as strong as Rousey, if not stronger. She definitely LOOKS stronger.

Ronda didn’t lose. Holm won. Let’s give her some headlines!

First off, have you seen the Canadian Air Force? We don’t have the money or the resources to be an aggressive military force. Our entire countries population is less than the State of California. This is why the Canadian Armed Forces are historically known as peacekeepers and engineers.

Except that ISIS leaders are too damn smart to position themselves in Raaqa. It’s like when the US invaded Fallujah...on both occasions, only the die-hard jihadi types fought US troops. The insurgent leadership fled to another location. Hence nuking Raaqa would do nothing except kill a huge number of innocent…

Gonna give them the benefit of doubt. I’m hoping Trudeau will recognize that for idealism to survive, you sometimes need good men and women with guns to protect it.

Not sure that nuking is the answer, but the Foreign Legion is awful good at taking care of things where others don’t want to get their hands dirty.

Our jets were responsible for 0.03% of all combat operations there since we joined the air-fight. Our presence in the air there is near negligible. It’s better if we shift resources to the support elements that are training and assisting Peshmerga (sic) forces on the ground. Speaking personally, if the government…

I wouldn’t mind nuking the assholes, but the land that they’re on isn’t theirs. They stole it from the people who were living there peaceably. We don’t have any right to destroy it and contaminate it. Unfortunately, when you’re on higher moral ground than your foe, you’ve gotta work three times harder to beat them.

Uhm, isn’t the Nevada test site considered uninhabitable, and continues to contribute to a twice-higher-than-average cancer rate? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_Te…

You and idiotic suggestions like that are why they’re able to recruit people. Just stop.

Obama, the guy that had Osama killed and his dead carcass dropped into the ocean? The guy that is willing to kill bad guys with hellfires in so-called friendly countries? The guy that authorized the Stuxnet cyber attack on Iranian centrifuges?

Considering his age and lack of seasoning, it will be interesting to see how Paris affects his foreign policy decisions.