Uhh, they’re clearly right in front of Lambert in the first row. I can’t imagine how distracting that would be mid-song and she was 100% in the right to call them out. Not that the message appears to have landed.
Uhh, they’re clearly right in front of Lambert in the first row. I can’t imagine how distracting that would be mid-song and she was 100% in the right to call them out. Not that the message appears to have landed.
But no laws have been enacted in California to restrict abortion or reproductive rights in the wake of the Dobbs ruling. In fact as you posit, just the opposite has happened. What is at issue here is the manner which this woman chose to give birth, which did not provide adequate care for her newborn. It seems…
The state has an interest in discouraging other people from doing similar stuff that results in death. This applies to anything. Discouraging parents from doing risky things that result in death of their children is a good thing.
Thank you. But given the author I’m not surprised by the hot take making a connection with Dobbs even though this took place in California and state laws haven’t changed.
I don’t understand the connection to Dobbs or Roe here.
I’m not seeing how this connects to Dobbs or Roe. Plus it takes place in California, which hasn’t changed its policies on access to abortion rights or healthcare. If anything it has strengthened those rights.
I have the same struggle. If you want to talk about what a post-Dobbs world looks like, it’s probably wise to choose a case that was charged and prosecuted after Dobbs as opposed to over a year before the decision. There’s no evidence here that CA prosecutors would be treating this case any differently if Roe were…
This is tricky. If you’re pro-choice then you have to hold that after a child is born, the parents are ultimately responsible for what happens.
***SPOILERS***
.
Joe Montana was really kind to my mother so he is the goat. Until Tom Brady politely speaks with my mother he’s always the second best QB of all time.
4th scenario. she’s found unresponsive, she’s known to use drugs, they administer it just because “maybe” and then move on to figuring out what was actually the problem.
Or did didn’t do anything for her and they then did other things which did. But only the Narcan got reported.
Maybe medical responders finding an unconscious rock star said “Hey, maybe we should administer Narcan, just in case.” That doesn’t seem like a huge leap in logic.
So non-binary is the same thing as a woman? I’m genuinely puzzled.
Exactly.
If you have to wait 13 weeks, I say now is the best time to renew your passport
Do you have a diesel truck? Have you been on the trucker side of the island at night? When you fill up on the trucker side of the island on the regular, you’ll understand why a place that’s trying to be a tourist attraction and advertise clean bathrooms doesn’t want to deal with pee bottles.
Three gunshots to the back doesn’t sound like self-defense, especially once the assailant fled the building.
this is an absolutely hateful comment to make about a movie where the entire plot is about being transgender, based on a work by a transgender author. there is no explicit moment where Nimona says “I’m transgender” but that doesn’t mean she isn’t trans, and her story isn’t a trans story. (just like Ballister and…
Nobody wants to see this disgusting pregnancy propaganda. Any pregnant celebrity being flaunted following the loss of Roe V. Wade is siding with the right wing. I said what I said.