bugiwgn
BUGIWGN
bugiwgn

You know...I appreciate the fact that he is a steward for the sport at the lower levels. But it would help if he wasn't such a jagoff. Regardless of what happened last summer, he is a turd of a human being and his actions show it. Let's ignore this guy and give our attention to Robby Gordon.

I think that, regardless of whether or not the spare tire issue is well known, you are still accurate in describing him as an idiot. I would also add a-hole, d-bag, etc.

I'm reminded of the early seasons of Top Gear when they would talk about various concept cars and new technology from 2005 or so. They had a line that they liked: "Remember where you were when you first saw this! This is the future!" And yet I'm still not driving a hydrogen fuel cell-powered chassis with

If there's one surprising thing I've learned about Canada, it's that laws regarding consumers or victims of crimes are sorely lacking. Maybe it's because being "nice" is so ingrained in their culture, they don't have measures in place when someone is being a dick.

I can't shake this feeling that we're so preoccupied with whether or not we could that we didn't stop to think if we should...

Sir, I personally have been enjoying this debate. Now that I finally had some time between work and sleep, I was able to reevaluate my stance because you almost had me second guessing myself. Being able to option the price of a car into the stratosphere is irrelevant to my argument, as you have pointed out, and I

All good points. You call me out for selecting the premium trim on each vehicle. My point is, should it be mathematically possible to double the price of an otherwise pedestrian car when adding "luxury" options? Isn't that what Lincoln is for?

Dude, have you seen the rear of a new Outback? They're massive. I have an '02, my in-laws have an '05, and my brother has a '12, and it's bigger back there by miles.

"Ford already charges too much for their cars"? How do you figure? Please do elaborate...

Actually, this is totally a burn on Ford, not Apple. I think Apple has earned their reputation for chic quality, whereas Ford has not. They just decided that they are, and therefore they are going to reflect this attitude by charging more.

Apple uses their image to mark up their products to the nth degree, which they weren't able to do if they weren't "cool". Ford already charges way too much for their cars; now that they think they're on the same level as Apple, get ready for $40,000 Focuses, $50,000 Fusions, and $70,000 F-150s everybody!

Is it wrong of me to simultaneously feel surprised and disappointed that these shitheads survived? So that they can get their slap on the wrist because nobody else got hurt, and hey, nothing bad can ever happen to rich males?

So what would you all think if a 6'4" 230lb man rode one of these? I'm, uh, asking for a friend...

Turbo Subaru owners have co-opted the Jeep wave, believe me. I've even gotten waves in my wife's non-turbo Impreza.

And Scion itself? Next year?

I submit the Chrysler/Plymouth/Dodge Neon. They're so horrendous in build quality that it's fairly rare to see them on the streets today, but they had surprisingly potent performance for their class back in the day. It proved quite successful in SCCA racing, rallying, autocross and a ton of other series. There's a

Honestly, I'd be surprised if anyone would say they'd be happier with one of these than the original. The NSX has been out of production for so long, and this is so different that I don't even see it as an NSX.

Could you imagine a modern BRAT/Baja based on the current Outback? AWD, lots of room, a truck bed, 30+mpg. It would be the perfect vehicle.

*shakes head* Kitchen mats protecting the floor. Every used car buyer wishes they can buy from a seller like this. Unfortunately, where I'm from, that generation of car buyer from the 1994 era never would have spent their union-earned money on some piece of "Jap Crap", so we have more interesting cars ruined by drug

I read this as the "Buick CANADA", and it was strangely entertaining.