No, it isn't actual history. Socialism and Naziism aren't the same thing, and if you'd actually bother to study it, you'd know that. I suspect you do know that and are simply being intellectually dishonest.

Using the wrong word and spell check aren't the same. You simply come off as a dipshit trying to sound smarter than you are.

“Unfortunately, the strength of that 2018 schedule—104th in the country—keeps them stuck all the way down at number eight in the CFP rankings.”

Stop reading D'Souza, he's rotting your brain.

I think you're looking for Caucasus Mountains, champ.

“Leftists" at least have some sense of accountability, unlike the "grab them by the pussy" crowd.

I read the greys, assuming that it couldn't be that bad. Real question, why did you do that to yourself? That was awful and I never want to do it again.

Is that really how you write? Good Lord.

Link, perchance?

I hate to sound like a total dick or an Above the Law commenter, but no organization really wants a Stetson Law grad as their legal counsel. I’m willing to bet Van Dyke was a garbage attorney.

I can’t be mad at Carlsen, but I will take issue with the format. This basically crowned the classical champion using rapid time controls.

This is the appropriate response to having a garbage player bail you out against a team you should beat comfortably. Mou's doing a great job.

From what I've read of Arnheim's comments on here, he/she doesn't strike me as a Berniebro. Maybe I'm wrong, though. I think this is just a good faith effort at intellectual honesty.

Second, related point: If your candidate loses the primaries, sure, be unhappy and complain a bit. Then, suck it up and participate in the general anyway!

I'm only chiming in to defend The Economist's insufferable high-mindedness. I thoroughly enjoy their magazine.

Your handle is fucking Buckeyemike. There is nothing that could make you hop on the hate wagon.

Why skip out on modern fiction? He's missing some seriously good shit. I guess on the plus side, I'll have a conversational edge in any hypothetical meeting with Ben Sasse.

I think it’s great the workers are getting something back, but I can’t help but be dismayed by the $20 million figure. Seems awfully low when Bain and the like will probably make a killing.

All this time I thought I was the only one.

I hate myself, so I read Vitale’s Parkland piece. Right at the top, he throws out the “existing gun laws don’t work, why would more gun laws help?” line of reasoning, because apparently existing inadequacies cut against trying to fix something, right?