Which pisses me off as a Lawyer with Discrimination cases... because idiots like her diminish the credibility of actual victims.
Which pisses me off as a Lawyer with Discrimination cases... because idiots like her diminish the credibility of actual victims.
Also use some judgment, the easy going polite well mannered friend probably wont cause any issues. A crazy asshole on the other hand...
Generally I believe women who claim they were attacked but I have a NPD alarm that sometimes goes off. Who would make up a bogus attack for attention someone with NPD.
Sometimes acting in different roles helps actors and actresses chill the F out. Doing a block buster production and huffing uppers and downs does not help one behave in a polite fashion.
Also something narcissistic people do.
He’s provided a remarkable demonstration of confirmation bias.
Well thats not quite what I’m saying, it’s just that its mostly a mitigating defense. They worded it more aggressively as an awesome strike against Donald. They knew he’d hear about it and they knew they’d tweak him, they were probably hoping to provoke his usual imbecilic behavior.
You see this **** a lot in these ludicrous fundy churches. Their morality causes severe sexual repression and honestly kick the rock over and you’ll find a lot of this crap in these communities. Look at the Duggers and their f-d up network of pedophiles. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the judge bore the same…
There is a difference between sexual assault(umbrella term) and rape(more specific). A sexual assault could include molestation for instance. Generally sexual penetration drives a harsher penalty than sexual touching.
Makes you wonder if the mother shouldn’t also be in a defendant’s chair.
Drunken sons who get away with masturbating in public parking lots and breaking into ex-girlfriend’s homes.
It’s a lot easier when you’re under contract.
nm, already answered :-)
This takes me back to my old legal writing class... God it was a decade ago... I had hope back then.
True but how do you quantify damages, even if he just claims that his feelings were hurt he could probably claim nominal damages. Which could then open the door for punitive relief.
No you still can be defamed... its just that the economic damages go out the window. The barb was legalese for F- you, your face, your family and the hair that rode in on you. We will fight you every step of the way you small handed b-tch.
EDIT: While I generally try to avoid gendered insults, I would call Donald Trump…
Clinton was always more of a policy wonk than Michelle, me thinks she chooses a public role in advocacy.
Locker rooms typically involve plenty of vulgar anecdotes and bizarre sexual speculation. Why not theyre mostly populated by sexually inexperienced adolescents. But A) we’re talking about minors here mostly compared to a 59 year old man, B) the conversation was well never that rapey in my experience.
Trump just gave the she’s too ugly defense.