Sounds like you’re misreading at a galaxy brain level.  He didn’t say “This genre is bullshit”, and he said he disliked the term ‘metroidvania’, not the style of game it represents.

Is this Jaden Smiths final form?

Biden is clinging to this outdated notion that if you’re nice to the Republicans, they’ll be reasonable with you, won’t flout the law, compromise, etc.

I really don’t think there’s any possible way we could know before that event actually took place.

I hope you didn’t scrape the bridge of your nose shoving your glasses up it to “well, actually” the OP.

The Democratic base is not progressive, it is moderate.

He couldn’t beat Ted Cruz, no way he wins a senate seat.  Pretty sure his political career is over.

for reasons we can’t profess to understand, top Democrats have barely reacted to her allegations

I never even remotely saw it as an F until you just said that, and even looking at it with that in mind I only get it from the grey outline.

I don’t feel it in the car, but I feel it in my head. Taking care of your belongings feels good.

But it’s 100 degrees out there!

What was a gripping narrative with really dark moments in Dragon Quest XI had turned into a fairy tale. Bad things happens in fairy tales, but for the most part, the consequences are minimal as good triumphs.

Unless it was garbage, and for MS to stick by Crackdown 3 (which, for the record, I enjoyed but it obviously had an awful legacy to live up to) but cancel Scalebound leads me to believe it just wasn’t any good.

...for someone so morally bankrupt, a display of a surprisingly straightforward aversion to bloodshed...

I’m not sure if it’s been rewritten, or when it was written, but here’s the current rule:

He’s absolutely playable in Midgar.

That’s not the rule though. Anyone in an offside position is obviously “part of the play”, but that’s not the language used. It’s explicitly spelled out what being “involved in active play” means:

I never said she wasn’t offsides (no one is saying that), but the rule absolutely is not “If you’re offsides that’s the only consideration”. I’m not agreeing or disagreeing with it, but the following language (from http://theifab.com/laws/chapter/31/section/87/) is what’s in question:

The way I think they’re applying the rule makes sense. Sure Lloyd was offside, but not egregiously so. If Lloyd had been in the same position but onside (6-12 inches back) the defender absolutely makes the same play on the ball.

I just finished a series playthrough yesterday for the first time since release and what I will never understand is why there’s a choice at all at the end of the game. Shepard should make the decision that your Shepard would make based on all your choices to that point.