bruceharper
RealBruceHarper
bruceharper

This is an absolutely insane attitude. Because you think the make or model of a undercover vehicle is questionable, you think you can then try and evade the cop, on the overwhelmingly tiny odds that he might be an impostor? What other societal mores and laws do you feel don't apply to you?

What am I missing here? There's barely any contact, the biker wasn't stopping, how can you even tell the cop knew someone was filming him and he tried to evade him, and how do you not mention the insanely reckless driving by the person filming it!!

and lastly, i wouldn't hold anyone who goes by "Chuck" professionally is definitely not a role model.

Also, emails from third parties, or really anyone else outside state those emails would not be saved. You are a public officials, you do not have the right to conduct professional correspondence with a personal email. it is unquestionably an ethical breach even if not a legal one.

the much larger and more important points are, this was a massive mistake in terms of info security and she has yet to explain why she did it.

What about their breath? Oh god their breath...

i hate to break this to you but she is clearly not a wonderful person. a parent who would do those things is by definition not a good person.

Even if that all is true, isn't that sportsmanship.

I don't know if it's a gender divide, my fav character (now at least, it was Robb when I read the books at 16) is Arya. I dig the Stannis storyline but despise Stannis.

It really doesn't seem like you like GoT.

given the amount of money he stole with his video game company I tend to think he had this coming

what do you mean? Is peace not a solution? If there is a scenario in which there can be long term peace is that not a solution?

Driving in New York City today I heard on the radio a phone prank in which a husband flipped out and talked about leaving his wife because she had supposedly signed up for a dance class he didn't give her permission to take.

Also, more birth control = less kids with parents who cant afford treatments. So, is she arguing for birth control? I'm so confused.

Can you explain what that sign means? I can't. Is she saying that birth control isn't a crisis because there are sick children? You realize why that's not an actual argument right? Should people not engage in the taking of beneficial medicine because there are sick children? Where's the connection?

I don't want a humble president. I don't want a president who I can have a beer with. I don't want the president to be down to earth. I want him to be smart, diplomatic, tough and quick. Do you want the president to be your friend? Get fucked.

Oops I responded to the wrong post. So tell me, Buzz, who are the true innovators with bloated salaries. What overpaid execs are actually the guys on the ground creating the world of the future? Is there a part of my post you'd like to respond to? Middle class aren't the real job creators? I thought you guys loved

I just want to make sure I have your logic down. Let's not do something beneficial for the country because there are some people who would STILL make too much money, even though it would be substantially less people overall making too much money. Is that correct? Also, as the article quoted, James brushes aside this

I love how much people discount the film business. Yes the actors at the top are grossly overpaid but the American entertainment machine aka Hollywood is directly responsible for the export of american culture in the last century. If you think there are world markets for american products without the american cultural

hahahah