My dad has an S550, so I know the type of people who buy these cars. Granted, no one who owns an S-class would never look at a Lincoln Continental, but these aren’t the 1960’s anymore. Owners of full-size luxury sedans are not 75 years old and borderline senile. They are middle-aged and generally wealthy, and also…

No one is going to spend 100K on a FWD vehicle.

Because they handle like $hit and have noses that are too long and have torque steer issues. And aren't as rugged/easy to repair

Front-wheel drive. Really? Why would anyone in this market possibly want a FWD vehicle?

Yup, he’s a douche bag. But you’re implying here that because he’s done dumb shit in the past, he must be guilty of this awful crime. That’s bullshit. He “probably” did it? So even if he were to be completely exonerated of this crime, are you saying you would still like to see him punished because of all the other…

What makes you automatically assume that Patrick Kane did this ? YOU guys are the worst, even more so than the die-hard Kane “bros.” Everyone is so quick to jump to conclusions when really nothing has been presented.

“poor accuser’s mother.” LOL really ? The fact that you don’t even know enough to call the “accuser” a…

“Yes, hello, this is Thomas Eoannou, the lawyer in that Patrick Kane case. Uh, I’m investigatin’ if you have all the DNA evidence still, cuz I have a lead that you guys are lying sacks of crap that are trying to defend Kane.”

“Oh, it’s all here.”

“Well, okay, I mean I am investigating if you are liars but I will take…

I only agree with the reporter doing her job part.

Other than being accused of the crime, what evidence has led you to believe he is guilty?

There is no evidence Kane raped the girl. In fact, there isn’t even evidence any intercourse even occurred. Kane’s DNA was not found below the waist. And now, the victim’s close friend does not want to testify because she’s not sure about the accounts of that night. You also have the mother with a major hoax. Patrick…

Saying this is the same thing as saying to the victim, she deserved what she got because she went home with him that night. Or saying to another women, you have had a history of sleeping around or you dress a certain way or you put yourself in a bad situation - what did you expect to happen - etc, etc. These are…

But you don’t know shit about the accuser. Maybe she’s a drama queen who makes stuff up all the time. We simply don’t know, we only have the evidence at hand. To say someone is probably a rapist because they’ve been an asshole in the past is a real leap.

Get the DNA results (which showed multiple men but not Kane - at least not in the genital area) thrown out. Ass-backwards logic of strengthening her daughters case by a goddamned idiot.

It’s possible that his moral code kicks in at beating and raping women. Are we also going to assume he’s a child molester because, fuck it, it’s Patrick Kane?

Patrick Kane probably did it

arguing that he did it because he has been a crap person in the past is basically the same thing as concluding a rape victim wasn’t raped because she’s slept with a lot of people in the past.

Ohhh, so all garbage people are rapists by default. Got it.

He probably did it why? Is there a shred of evidence?

How do you know he “probably” did? This is the first I’ve heard of this case, and the few articles I’ve read (literally in the past 5 minutes to catch up) haven’t really show anything leading to the fact he did.) What articles have you read that I can catch up on?