Why is Teigen getting all the shit for this when her fucking husband threw the party too?
Why is Teigen getting all the shit for this when her fucking husband threw the party too?
It’s embarrassing that this is an article. Please find some dignity, and/oran actual story to write. Manufacturing faux outrage over this (they werent even too ashamed of themselves to post pics!) is amazingly stupid.
Oof. This ‘article’ is a reeeeeach.
Mad I gave this a click. Forget a nothingburger; there’s barely enough here to scrape into a nothingmeatball
Thanks for the permission not to like her. My dislike started in 1991. Why do I suspect that was before you were born?
Having worked with Bronson Pinchot in the past I can say he has VERY little room to talk
Ok, fair point... but the first names sound almost exactly the same! *eyeroll*
I can’t for the life of me figure out what that subheader is supposed to say. Or Britney Spears what?
When the last paragraph only features the title of the thing the article is supposedly based on, and is spent poorly relating it the other thing it’s marginally related to...
Never planned on watching this, I don’t need the memory rehash, tbh. R.I.P.
Yeah, it’s a bit disappointing and I’m not sure it’s helpful.
I think a good discussion about these biopics is in order; I haven’t watched a Spears one so I don’t know that I’m in a GREAT position to criticize (I can believe they helped with public perception; they made me feel a bit icky, though), but I had hoped for…
And it’s weird because it’s such a reach. Brittany Murphy may have gotten shit from the tabloids and awful people like Perez Hilton, but her life wasn’t an open book the way Spears’s was. Even people who didn’t follow celebrity gossip knew that Britney Spears was having a meltdown. I don’t think you could say the same…
Yeah, I had to read that like 7 times to understand that they weren’t saying Britney died in 2008.
Pretty high-minded rhetoric from a site that regularly trucks in celebrity gossip itself.
There’s barely a handful paragraphs in this article, ostensibly about the Brittany Murphy documentary, that don’t frame everything about her life in terms of Britney Spears. What a way to defend her humanity.
“Murphy’s struggles parallel Spears’s, right down to the widespread ridicule of her marriage to a grifter and the grotty “I told you so”s that came after Spears’s 2008 and Murphy’s 2009 death”
hold up
What the actual hell is the tone of this article???
That doesn’t even make sense. It’s not like there are some situations where a film would need to use live rounds. So why would this even be a possibility? One thing we know: it was almost certainly all caught on camera.
Shannon doesn’t have a conscience or any journalistic integrity. The entirety of her portfolio is just an ongoing effort to find new ways to drag Jezebel further into the sleazy underbelly of tabloid gossip and celebrity harassment.
What the fuck is this headline? It makes it sound like Baldwin was complicit in some way in the shooting. I get it, he’s an asshole, but there’s literally 0 evidence that on his end this was anything but an awful accident. The prop guy may be culpable, but Baldwin sure as shit isn’t.