Ok Warren yes, I agree with that. I have my issues with her, but overall I think she’s been unfairly attacked (well besides the Native American thing, which isn’t really bad, but she handled it in about the worst way possible)

So for legal purposes I won’t say I support the egging of certain members of the GOP.

Assumedly this

I’m wagering on stroke and then living in an immobile and incommunicative fog while he constantly piss and shits himself. 

Great thanks to that comment I now have Paulie Gualtieri’s laugh stuck in my head.

“the same shit they pulled in 2o16"

Eh.

If the “purity test” (your words, not mine) is asking what candidate embodies the policies Americans want, and ISN’T going to do a repeat of the Clinton campaign, then it’s good and needs to happen. And also not a purity test.

The next Democratic president, whenever that happens, will in all likelihood call for a return to norms and a period of healing or whatever bullshit helps them feel good about the country they’ve signed up to run. Trump will never face real consequences for his actions like you or I would. It will be undoubtedly…

Yeah. All things are alleged until you’re confident enough to press charges.

I mean that’s just legal jargon for “it’s a hate crime, but we don’t have enough evidence to prosecute.”

Yes, they wouldn’t have accepted or acknowledged anything but an exoneration.

Whatever you say dude who listened to a single Citations Needed episode and thinks he’s a revolutionary now.

Your point would be better made if you didn’t make the edgy “as a white man” comment.

I’ll plug the new Flume mixtape with SOPHIE and JPEGMAFIA again because I’ll be blasting it all weekend and it’s REALLY good.

Ah yes, the Hessians.

100% it’ll be somewhere between reductive and false.

Excellent...self reply?