Very true, and very likely. I’m just saying that the only reason people seem to think these structures will do anything is because Hello Games showed (albiet a long time ago) that they would.

Occam’s razer should’ve been the tagline for the game.

If I saw your comment sooner, I would have commented to say that you are that person, I bet. Gamers don’t have broad visions, they don’t see past the product.

Uhm... I’ll be on record here by saying that I definitely enjoyed my time in No Man’s Sky, I’m not spouting the complaints that have been repeated ad nauseum, but what are you on about here?

Are you dense? On the one hand you’re saying the game is bad and empty, but then you’re turning around and saying that thousands of hours won’t even scratch the surface of the game. Those two things seem mutually exclusive. Make up your mind.

While your analogy is logically correct, its the wrong analogy. Its more like this:

Please list these features. I would like to hear what this 50 percent consists of. Because I got exactly the game I was expecting. It seems to me like most people who are complaining were, for some idiotic reason, expecting a game that Hello never claimed to be making in the first place. I’ve seen people complain…

Complaining because you don’t like a game, and circumventing rules to get a refund for a game that you’ve played for dozens of hours and thusly causing the developer to lose money, are worlds apart. Not even remotely similar.

This is unbelievably stupid, and you’re stupid for typing it. What an entitled, whiney moron.

Simply not liking something is reasonable grounds for a refund? What kind of fantasy land do you live in? Even more absurd when you’ve played many hours beyond what the refund policy allows, yet still somehow feel entitled to a refund because you don’t like it.

Sounds to me you’re just trying to generalize every person asking for a refund.

However you want to frame it, it’s a form of justification for a dishonest act, and it’s bullshit.

Irrelevant. If it was good enough for you to eat, then it was good enough for you to pay for. If you don’t, you stole the pizza. Justify it to yourself any way you like, but that is what you did.

Sorry, I don’t agree. That just sounds like justification to me.

Somehow I missed your comment out of the sea of grays and non-grays.

Then maybe they should have figured out that they disliked it enough to demand a refund before sinking dozens upon dozens of hours into it.

For a procedurally generated game, it seems reasonable that players familiar with such games might just think “Hey, maybe the game’s sucked this long because of RNG.” I mean it’s happened to me in games where I just run a very, very unlucky streak for multiple hours. So yes, there’s plenty of justification to want a…

Many gamers are sociopaths. Or many sociopaths are gamers.

En masse, gamers are the most dispicable, foul mouthed, underhanded, devious, evil creatures to ever walk the earth.......or at the very least browse the internet.

Every purchase comes with a degree of risk. Hello games made many lofty promises, but they never guaranteed you’d love the game. When you go to the movie theater and dislike the movie, you think you’re entitled to have your money back? Or if you buy a blu-ray and don’t like the movie in it, you’re supposed to get your…