I think it’s kind of funny that your comment sounds more like only men watch porn.
I guess women watched Magic Mike and Fifty Shades of Grey for the drama?

Bit sexist question, innit? Not only does this premise assume women don’t watch it, you also assume women who have no problem with it are lying.

How about the inverse? I’m a man who’s partner enjoys pornography. It’s had absolutely zero impact on our relationship.

Yeah, sounding like an authority really sets you off, doesn’t it? Are you the radical egalitarian that the hard right always warned me about? The one that’ll tear down every institution and expert at hand so you don’t look or feel inferior?

Are you basimg that presumption on me posting here... literally doing the same thing as you are doing right now? That is pretty rich for someone who research extends no further than the third result of a google search for “hillary syria”, huh?

I think voting third party is basically more a personality trait than a judgment. The people who are attracted to third parties want someone who is an amateur; that’s the whole point.

Shhhhhh, facts aren’t welcome here. Hillary is actually responsible for Putin in this situation, because ... some irredeemable asshole really wanted to post this picture as part of a cheap shot.

Well you say that, but the problem is that it idiotic. The American party system features broad coalitions and, particularly the Democrats, this means that the policy preferences of any individual member, even the presidential candidate, are not and in fact cannot be determinative for every other member. This is…

She was just gaining traction and someone made a mistake. Get the fuck over it already.

if you know her personally, you should adviser to quit pandering to fringe wackos for votes

She is pandering to anti-science nutjobs which is honestly much much worse. She’s not ignorant but she is willing to fuel ignorance if it gets her some votes. That shows such a lack of convictions and morals.

Then why won’t she come out and give a straight answer and say she’s pro vaccine? All she does is dance around and say nonsensical shit about how she’s not anti-science but her looney-tunes anti-vax supporters have questions and these questions must be addressed.

And the wifi nonsense...

I don’t believe she is anti-vax. I do believe she attempted to walk a thin line and pander to the anti-vax crowd, though.

She’s also anti-GMO and pro-homeopathy. What’s next, chemtrails and FEMA camps?

I mean, there *are* real questions about vaccine safety, inasmuch as real people ask them. Those people are wrong.

And GMOs.

Yeah, I was going to suggest that Stein is to anti-vaxxers as Trump is to evangelicals: willing to court the science-proof idealogues while knowing full well how destructive and backwards their ideas are.

Yeah. She’s not anti-vax in the same way Mitch McConnell wasn’t a birther. He never said President Obama wasn’t born in America, he just acknowledged that “many Americans have questions” about it.

I am certainly not hostile to science. I’m not anti-science.