Idiot-manchild at the reigns is not equivalent to idiot-manchild-puppet-of-foreign-power at the reigns. Not even close. If you think it is, then there’s no nice way to say this, you’re delusional.
Idiot-manchild at the reigns is not equivalent to idiot-manchild-puppet-of-foreign-power at the reigns. Not even close. If you think it is, then there’s no nice way to say this, you’re delusional.
Yeah, I have no problem whatsoever with this piece of shit dying, slowly and painfully even. I just don’t think it represents good policy for society to carry that out. My personal sense of outrage or desire for vengeance isn’t a good method for making laws.
How does one win an argument with a person who is determined to misunderstand everyone else’s position?
Being cultivated by, in league with, and now blackmailed by a foreign power is hardly “dumb bs”. His sexual interests don’t really matter on their own, but giving Russia the ability to manipulate a top government official is kind of a big fucking deal.
pardon?
Also, pretty sure that would have been a slam-dunk sex discrimination case if she’d tried to actually enforce that.
Oh also, let’s not forget, according to recent articles from left-leaning media, Fidel Castro was a hero of the people, and an anti-imperialist. Shit, I’m all for calling out America’s bullshit, we have plenty of it. But replacing the blind, idiotic nationalism of the right with an idealization of some of the most…
I was thinking the same thing. Leaving aside the author’s clear ignorance on even the extreme basics of this subject, it’s pretty clear she doesn’t understand the scientific method either. How often do professionals, of nearly any field, claim “absolute certainty” on anything but the most trivial of subjects? …
In Soviet Russia, utopia build you!
I can’t tell if this site has gotten more clickbaity in the last year or two, or if I’ve gotten a little better at detecting bullshit? Maybe both. But thank you for the breakdown, it was far more interesting, and informative, than this embarrassment of an article.
But the declassified report contained no information about how the agencies had collected their data or had come to their conclusions.
Exactly one sentence of this article had anything to do with its title.
They are outwardly really nice people
I feel bad for the kid, but a backwards stance toward trans people is only a fraction of everything that’s wrong with the Boy Scouts. I suppose that they might be reformed from within, but a pretty big part of me wonders if it wouldn’t be better for them to lose influence and make room for new groups that weren’t…
That seems to be very nearly everyone who’s tried to argue with me so far. They seem to be almost pathologically determined to miss the point. I’m sorry I wasted as much effort on this person. I should find better ways to relieve my boredom.
Wow. Your “race traitor” accusation has been noted. Your complimentary swastika is in the mail.
I’d have given you a D. Do you really expect me to believe that your reading comprehension is just that poor?
I’m not sure why you’re having trouble understanding what I just explained to you, at length. No part of it contradicts yourself. And you seem to have difficultly differentiating between “White Genocide”, and “the murder of white people”. The first is the name of a fictitious conspiracy peddled by white supremacists…
Except for everything you just said is predicated on the idea that such a thing as white genocide exists at all.
Or you just made an incredibly charitable interpretation of his (likely deliberately) vague statement. The guy said something douchey, idiotic, and deliberately inflammatory for reasons that have nothing to do with white supremacist tropes, and is now crying that he received a negative response.