The first person to describe this film as “(Another Movie) on acid” will be summarily executed.

“The results should probably be taken with a grain of salt, because they were only statistically significant (typically in medical research, that means there’s less than a 5 percent chance of the effect happening by chance) if the date ranges were set to the specific ones the researchers used.”

So is declaring yourself “normal” and things that make you uncomfortable “abnormal” by fiat.

“It wasn’t at all a secret that ABC’s new Muppet show isn’t, well, good. In fact it’s terrible.”

So, did you drive on a freeway on your way to work today?

Person in Internet comment dislikes thing, film at 11.

Relax, kids, you're BOTH idiots! ^_^

Brilliant logic! I can't wait until your next treatise comes out on how black = white and you kill yourself at a zebra crossing.

So, you did go and read the original study to make sure that this "crap science" wasn't just misleadingly summarized by a sensationalistic Gawker blog, and that the "fourth-cousin" assertion wasn't fully sensible and statistically significant in its full context, right? I mean, for starters, isn't the salient question…

Well, gosh, Ender, it would just be such a shame to lose you.

Rob doth protest too much:

Yeah, but you're not a professional athlete who wouldn't get to do what he loved if this didn't happen.