I hear car drivers are just peaches when they have to wait for five seconds behind a cyclist despite having just waited for 20 minutes in line at Starbucks.

or perhaps they are always having their lives endangered by assholes like you 

1. Not all cycling is exercise.
2. Adrenaline will go down if you don’t have to fear for your life.
3. There is no overreaction to being almost murdered by an 1500kg heavy block of steel. You can literally compare it to someone accidentally (or, more likely, intentionally) waving a loaded gun at you. Wouldn’t you…

Hate to be that guy, but it’s an Armada

awww, why couldn’t it be a toyota sequoia?

Don’t forget Tesla had counted on mountains of taxpayer backed loans to get started.

Same with me I hate crowds and found Oasis of the Seas to be very open and only crowded when leaving or returning to the ship

You’d be surprised at how unconfined you’ll feel on one of these ships.  I took a cruise on Allure of the Seas a decade ago, and it was easy find things to do, and find places to be alone.  It helps if you like to eat, like I do.

You're confusing the meaning. This list of names is intended to be a joke rather than an actual proposed list of names.

“ problem in the United States is that most of the railroad is owned by freight.”

Yes, but I highly doubt they would tweet that they found the debris field of the Titanic. They are tweeting this because they found the debris field of the Titan’s implosion. 

There isn’t one.

Regardless of what your actual opinion is about dealerships... what is the legal argument that justifies mandating their existence? And why wouldn’t the same “reasoning” apply to, say, Apple Stores? Why can Apple sell direct to the public, but not GM?

Florida really doesn’t want anyone to live there or visit.

Where is that quote from? The current wording of the article says “neither the self-driving car nor the onboard safety driver were able to stop the car from hitting the dog” - if that’s the same sentence but edited, then to me that seems like it was just the writer’s interpretation of events based on second-hand…

Jaguar is an apex predator.

Just because it recognized it doesn’t mean it was in a position to avoid the outcome, right? This seems like it is written to intimate that the car “saw” the dog, identified it as a dog, and then made a decision to plow into it. 

I am. In Florida v Riley in 1989 the Supreme Court said:

I am going to be that guy:

Sure, let’s fix this by handing it over to a series that’s been completely ruined by gimmicks...