brensweets
brensweets
brensweets

You do realize that bunnies are flesh and blood creatures and Legos are plastic toys, right?

... they are Legos, guy.

I think maybe thou dost protest too much, #maddad. They are plastic toys in a PG flick. You're showing your 4 year old a movie rated PG and complaining about it online. That's on you.

It's rated PG. It's not "a Disney movie" or something that's explicitly geared towards small children. The PG rating explicitly means "parent guidance suggested, some material may not be suitable for children". If you're taking 3 and 4 year olds to a PG rated flick, it's YOUR fault they're scared, not the movie's.

I'll MAYBE accept that you didn't like it... but "awful"? That's just nonsense.

Haven't superhero flicks, and Marvel flicks especially, been trending towards funny and goofy for a while? Avengers is hilarious in spots, and both Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 are downright silly compared to say, Man of Steel. Cap 2 was serious to be sure, but it seems like GotG is the continuation of a trend rather than a

Let's be honest. You're from Detroit. You can't possibly have any concept of what you'd do if the most beautiful woman on earth wanted you back.

Not even defending it. Just confused that first you said that it doesn't serve a narrative purpose (which it obviously does) and then later said "I don't like it", which is fine, but isn't the same thing, brah.

So you don't like Quentyn, who cares? Don't pretend like homeboy doesn't serve a narrative purpose.

Why dedicate so many pages to Quentyn?

Weeks later? How embarrassing are you, actually? #trollforChrist14

(One year later)

You've already admitted to trolling, dumbfuck. I'm not sure if you're aware of how this fucking website works, you dolt, but I can actively see the entire thread. Your other posts are immediately above the box I'm typing in. I'd take a screenshot for you if I honestly gave a shit about you or any of this. If "reading

It's io9, you simple fuck.

Calling a dipshit a dipshit makes me feel like a person with basic observational abilities. However, reading your attempts at "argument" and "trolling" makes me feel like a goddamn genius in comparison, so thanks for that.

Yes. My huge gif collection is called "google", you embarrassing dipshit.

You are far, far too stupid to "make me mad", you goofy bastard. You have successfully made me sad, though, in that you seem oblivious to your own ineptitude.

It's funny that of all of these so-called grammatical errors, the only one you could point out is part of a completely flippant and informal statement that obviously isn't even intended to comply with anything. Nothing says "worthwhile human being" like a pedantic twit nitpicking grammar on fast and informal comments

Andrew Garfield is 100000X better as Peter Parker than Tobey MaGuire ever was. Plus this Spider Man is actually funny and the effects are great. So the flick has that going for it. But, it's a convoluted mess and everything involving Peter's parents could have been cut with it having zero discernible impact on

So you're still sticking up for your unforgivably stupid stance, eh? I DID read the article, and am shocked that you're this horrible at pretty basic logic. Think about it. How many passengers are in the back of the plane, and in what distribution? Airliners weigh seriously hundreds of tons, and nearly all passenger