I'd disagree entirely. Your reading of the comment makes very little to no sense unless you're trolling the interwebs looking for spots to spew NRA produced nonsense.

Alan, I've been a dedicated reader for years and I'm extremely pumped to see you here. In your mind, what's the single show that you most wish had gotten to run to a just and fitting end? Deadwood? Firefly? Something else?

Sepinwall = good, Simmons = bad. This is your second step towards coming over to the light. (reading and commenting on Deadspin was your first)

Actually, it makes perfect sense. OP said he didn't think it would have mattered if Belcher had a gun or not. Rebuttal presented evidence as to the effectiveness of guns as a method of extinguishing human life. (and actually used the word "effectively" while comparing gun violence to strangling and beating to…

I believe that contextual implication was made entirely by you and you alone.

I'm confused as to what you think you're arguing? The OP said that he didn't think it mattered whether there was a gun or not b/c Belcher "snapped", the response argued that guns are much more effective at killing, WHICH YOU AGREED WITH.

What I'm saying is that I don't and you shouldn't come to Deadspin to have serious discussions. You clearly don't, because you offer up intellectual flotsam as some sort of brilliant discourse.

Dude. This is deadspin... not exactly a dissertation. I could give a flipping fuck what I make "gun control activists" (obvious give-away to your politics there) look like on a site famous for publishing Brett Favre's dong.

+1

Welp, guess what guys? Stop talking about how guns kill thousands of people annually, because some people will still die anyway. DISCUSSION OVER. Dude PWNed you n00bs.

He may well have "snapped". But the thing about guns is that it pretty much guarantees a kill when you do snap. Let's say you "snap" but have only your bare hands available.. there are a multitude of additional steps required between said snappage and actual murder. These additional steps are opportunities for the…

+1

That seems like a pretty big logical leap.

+1

Um. Buying a Bentley will tend to lead to financial issues.

Couldn't he just have said "pepper-sprayed" in a throwaway way as in, "that's something that happens on this planet"? If logic is indeed good for you, I'd suggest employing some rather than being a hyperbolic blowhard.

Well, Nebraska DID go 10-3. Pretty much every other team in the B1G would have killed for that mark, even if it meant giving up 130+ to tOSU and Wiscy.

Fair enough. Sometimes Batman's supporters on the interwebs get a little outrageous so I just wanted to make sure we weren't getting carried away.

Look, I'm as big a Bruce Wayne fan as anyone, but multiplying Tony Stark by 100? C'mon, man. Even Reed Richards might be a X1.5 Tony Stark and that dude has invented everything from trans-dimensional travel to time travel to revolutionary leaps in basically every scientific discipline. Bruce Wayne's brilliance is…

Why? Aren't there approximately 37,000 levels between "shooting someone" and "strangling/beating them to death"?