Simple enough for me.

...I think I’ll stick to WeatherTech, thanks.

Based on my understanding of the PPP loan docs, probably wouldn’t even need to claim it as an error...

I wouldn’t bet on it. PPP is ripe for fraud, and there’s way too much money that has been given away for Uncle Sam to exercise oversight that’s even remotely adequate.

I, too, start law school next month.

Credit check (even soft) for a car rental? I’ve never heard of that. That’s nuts. But makes sense, I guess.

Here in Los Angeles, one unit of publicly-financed homeless housing costs $600,000.

Drives like shit? I don’t think so, considering what type of vehicle it is. What year and engine?

We’ve had one for years. They’re not great, but they’re not that bad. And it’s a great truck (once you take the reliability out the picture!). 

What’s special about cruise ships? Freighter traffic hasn’t declined. Are only cruise ships plugged into this weather network? 

They’re moving cars like there’s no tomorrow.

No doubt that it’s not invested/hoarded/etc., but that doesn’t mean it’s being spent in the local economy. Bunch of it goes off to pay credit card debt, student loans, and so on. 

‘Tis my namesake!

Surprised: No one. 

Who said the order was invalid or illegal? I certainly never did.

Judges have a wide amount of discretion - nothing wrong with the intent per se, but the tone and tenor was ludicrous.

I’m with GM on this one. That order was ridiculous.

Mitsubishi still sells cars in the U.S. and someone is worried about Nissan? They’re not going anywhere.

Beat me to it.

The bus was put there to house workers building a road. The road was never completed, but the trail that people follow now is that road - it deteriorated quickly after it was abandoned. Things don’t last in the Alaskan bush.