hahaha, cute. “I used a phrase to indicate you don’t understand my mastery of rhetoric, but i certainly didn’t call you dumb.”

you answered a question with a question and then call me dumb for answering?

curiosity with a side of boredom

No one has to agree or laugh. That’s an unjustified read of what I wrote.

That’s not at all what I’m saying. I suppose it could be read that way, it’d be a bigger assumption than the one you made about whiseyprayer, but we’re talking about what you consider to be relevant.

Nope. Not even a little.

That’s a hell of a leap. It, in no way, indicates that the OP didn’t read the article.

you’re really hung up on this as a response to this article thing, aren’t ya?

I laughed.

puffed rice cereal treat beams (rice krispy treats would be fine too) to keep the walls vertical

RT’s theory is pretty sound. Much more so than the “i did this thing, believe me” that Dipshit McDweeb is providing.

oh, honey. no.

So there are a several groups of nerds to easily dismiss? I guess it’s a good thing people are writing articles about them so they don’t all get lumped together.

That, and the petitions. And the twitter hashtags. And the YouTube rants.

I mean, it is pretty easy to dismiss a nerd who ludicrously claims that they “defeated” Disney’s massively successful movie with fake user reviews (which, does anyone even read those?) and then getting caught in a lie.

For its part, a Rotten Tomatoes spokesperson thinks that DWDTFF is full of shit, and is retroactively searching for evidence to prop up a false claim.

cool cool. I’d still talk to someone though. Help’s out there.

yikes. you okay?

you’re weird.

hahahah... “you’re not good enough for an explanation” is what you’re going with?