The others are to 130 or 140 in the case of the DSG.
The others are to 130 or 140 in the case of the DSG.
You have displeased the internet.
Actually I prefer the WRX interior over the RS and I have a base model from 2015. The stereo is crap and the rearview camera display is on a tiny screen but it has a better feeling to me than the Focus otherwise.
I see your points... and I may be alone in thinking the RS/Golf R performance is a bit hyped.
All test figures have caveats. IMO the 5-60mph test is influenced heavily by gearing. For instance, the 2004 STi had a 5-60mph of 5.8 which is slightly quicker than the RS: http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/2004-subaru-impreza-wrx-sti-page-2
Time to go to an alternative website? See wut I dun thar hue hue hue.... even the libtards got it hue hue.
And they prohibit “mobile igloos”!
Light, durable, and affordable are a few reasons. Pretty popular for track usage.
Car and Driver did 0-60 in 4.8 seconds with the 2015 WRX using only one shift at the direction of a Subaru employee who was track-side. Remember, the new WRX has a 6-speed manual which led a lot of reviewers to shift an extra time for some reason. Also, the 2015 is published as 1/10 second faster in the quarter mile…
Oh the horror! Did the wheels break at the ford and did everyone get dysentery?
Mustass?
We need to make the entire world a safe-space! By force if necessary! Safe spaces ahkbar!!!!!!
Je suis HondAnonymous!
I’m with you! You present yourself quite well!
I missed the vote but next time I’ll be rooting for a Chevette with an LS swap!
Long live the data nerds!
In Soviet Russia, rust don’t rust ship, ship ships rust!